[ut3] linux client

Kevin Guillaume kevin.guillaume at gmx.net
Thu Feb 28 08:55:46 EST 2008


You bring up the poignant truth that we're getting no more actual information 
here, than you or anybody could provide with an autoresponder.

I agree.

-Kev


On February 28, 2008 06:56:51 am Jordi Bosveld wrote:

> Your point about the client being late is valid, and I guess I speak for
> most of us when I say I would really like a Linux client just about now,
> but seriously, what answer other than "it is being worked on" do you
> expect to get? It has been stated many times, but I will say it once
> more: Ryan will not give any estimates because they are hard to give and
> tend to disappoint people. I ask again, what answer other than "it is
> being worked on" do you expect to get? Exactly. Then what is the point
> in asking? To put pressure on Epic? Wrong place. To put pressure on
> Ryan? If it is going to have an effect at all, it will not be in your
> favour. To annoy us? This one seems the most plausible so far :P
>
> It seems some people want to hear "it is begin worked on" every week or
> so. You know what, send your update requests to me from now on, I will
> gladly send you a (auto)reply telling you it is being worked on, that
> way you will hear what you want to hear and the list will be freed of
> this not-so-useful chatter ;)
>
> If all I/we wanted to hear was Ryans messages, sure. But explain to me
> technically how to filter the weekly update request and the thread that
> follows, while letting useful discussion pass through. If Ryan says the
> client is being worked on, it is being worked on until he says
> otherwise. I really don't think it's our fault you need to be told the
> same thing over and over and over again.
>
> Seriously, both your frustration and hunger for information are
> understandable, but these inquiries are very much useless (even
> annoying), so please stop asking, because all you are going to hear
> is..........





More information about the ut3 mailing list