[ut2003io] Unreal 2

[floam]

um. unreal 2 is single player, there is no server.

D. Olson wrote:

>On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 20:13:27 -0500
>Eric Lathrop <eslathro at mtu.edu> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>>I *really* want this game, as I prefer single player games. UT2003
>>>is fine and all, and I had to get it, but I want U2.
>>>      
>>>
>>I know. My main reason for buying UT2K3 was to encourage Epic to
>>make a linux version of Unreal 2.
>>
>>Fingers crossed,
>>  --Eric Lathrop
>>    
>>
>
>Is it up to Epic? If so, they said that we (Linux users) should get a
>client if they were gonna make a server for Linux too. And I totally
>agree with that - it's been far too long that we get servers only. And
>UT was a fantastic game with lots of replayability. I still play it.
>UT2003 was a good title to get for Linux.
>
>Now, I have Unreal for Linux thanks to Chunky's installer, and so that
>leaves but one piece missing... Unreal 2.
>
>But, is Unreal 2 going to need a server? If not, then there goes one
>reason to port to Linux... However, it uses the same engine as UT2003,
>right? So I would think that a lot of the work has been done
>already... But I could be wrong.
>
>Either way, I've made my opinion known to Legend, and there are people
>from Epic here that know it as well. I'm only one person, yeah. So my
>opinion doesn't matter *that* much. But given that we're talking about
>Linux, I make up what, 3% of all Linux users? ;)
>
>If it happens, great! I'll buy it, if it doesn't, well, that sucks,
>but there are still games I don't have yet that I can spend my money
>on. I just gotta do something about getting some money now. :)
>
>  
>