[quake3] Elite Force Comparison Shots
arny at ats.s.bawue.de
Wed Mar 5 18:23:28 EST 2008
On Mittwoch, 5. März 2008, Stephan Reiter wrote:
> 3. Backport the changes to the latest revision of the ioquake3 code. I
> think you'd be happy to get it this way and not with included EF stuff.
> Thilo's patch should be easy to apply, because I'm basically just touching
> code in the renderer-subdirectory.
Yes, indeed. I can always resolve conflicts in my patch at a later time..
So, don't be considerate about the EF patch.
This is one of the more impressive shots.
By the way, I got a few things on my mind still:
Firstly, if you did not change too much in the renderer, you should be able to
use the built-in /video command in ioquake3 to record videos. In more recent
revisions, a bug in sound recording was fixed, so if you use that one and
don't use OpenAL you can even record sound. You can record videos with higher
resolutions, as the engine will record a constant 25fps and will slow down if
the performance does not suffice such that the time scale is correct in the
Secondly, I was curious whether the rendering in your ioquake3 version is
already multicore capable.
And thirdly, complexity in ray-tracing is probably also dependent on the
number of triangles in a scene. I also had the impression that the videos
showed maps with not that many polygons.
Fourthly, what are windows users going to do? g++ is not common there as you
That's enough questions for now :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the quake3