[cod] Fedora and CoD

Eduardo E. Silva esilva at silvex.com
Mon Jan 19 21:33:50 EST 2004


LOL!

Bryan Kuhn said:
> I think you mistyped sendmail instead of postfix :)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eduardo E. Silva [mailto:esilva at silvex.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 6:07 PM
> To: cod at icculus.org
> Subject: RE: [cod] Fedora and CoD
>
> I am still using RH 9. I will build another server from scratch, but this
> time I will not use RPMs for:
>
> - Apache
> - Sendmail
> - OpenSSH
> - PHP
> - Open SSL
> - Kernel
> - Bind
> - Perl
> - Iptables
> - ?
>
> This way I will build them from True Open source and not rely on Fedora's
> update.
>
> Theo Macris said:
>> Fedora, I just ran a LAN server with 2 CoD servers on it. Ran just
>> fine, no complaints. Are you having an issue? as far as I can tell,
>> Fedora is just RH 9.0 with a new name tag. On a broader level, this
>> pay to play attitude that redhat is starting seems a bad precedent to
>> support. It may be grounds for moving to another distro like Slack or
>> Deb.
>> kp
>>
>> ---- Original Message ----
>> From: esilva at silvex.com
>> To: cod at icculus.org
>> Subject: RE: [cod] Fedora and CoD
>> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:00:50 -0800 (PST)
>>
>>>Many of you are aware that Red Hat will no longer support RH 9 and
>>>earlier
>>>after April 2004. We have two choices: Red Hat advance server 3.x or
>>>Fedora 1.
>>>
>>>Has anybody run the CoD binary using either one of these new Red Hat
>>>versions?
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>Ed Silva
>>>Silvex Consulting Inc.
>>>esilva at silvex.com
>>>(714) 504-6870 Cell
>>>(714) 897-3800 Fax
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Ed Silva
> Silvex Consulting Inc.
> esilva at silvex.com
> (714) 504-6870 Cell
> (714) 897-3800 Fax
>
>


-- 
Thanks,

Ed Silva
Silvex Consulting Inc.
esilva at silvex.com
(714) 504-6870 Cell
(714) 897-3800 Fax




More information about the Cod mailing list