[bf1942] Issues regarding "ranked servers"

InCisT InCisT at Popsikle.net
Sun Jun 5 16:10:27 EDT 2005

Chris Adams wrote:

>"The only support i've seen coming from the list in 
>regards to this is from GSPs that have obviously gotten a contract, so
>think its a great idea" - well you can hardly blame the ones of us who
>have no interest in actually playing the game :-)
>Seriously though I do agree that this is going to be truly awful if
>non-ranked servers are not allowed exactly the same game that the ranked
>servers have, just without the ranking, and keeping all this weapon
>limiting to ranked servers only. If you take a look back at my post last
>night though, I do think that this could turn out very well, with
>serious gamers sticking to non-ranked servers (as really which serious
>clan / league players care about global ranking?), and the n00bs, newbs
>and l33t h4x0rs sticking to the ranked servers. I could however be
>totally wrong.
>Chris Adams
>GameSwitch Ltd.
>(0871) 218 GAME
>+44 (0)871 218 4263

You sir, are an ass. Bfstats and sites like such, are dominated by clan 
members and clans looking to get the highest rank. EA knows this, and 
your in support of it becuase you are taking money out of players 
pockets for this.  I would venture to say that at least 75% of us that 
host servers started doin ti for the game, not for the money, and arent 
influenced by some money-toting asshole that is going to FUCK the 
community that already pays thier bills.  You play this game more then 
anyone, you buy hosting services, and such for your team, We are gonna 
FUCK you if you dont go with EA.

Becuase pubbies make the market go around, and you should obviosuly 
cater to the pubbies.


More information about the Bf1942 mailing list