[bf1942] BF1 Question : Using FireDaemon Pro to run bf1942?
aking at gblx.net
Wed Apr 13 09:44:07 EDT 2005
Try linux. daemons are native to it and foreign to windoze. No need to
reboot the server when an app misbehaves, etc. All in all, superior -
except when trying to play games. :) For servers, though, WAY more stable
Systems Administrator II
IP Systems Engineering
Global Crossing, Ltd.
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Brigham Stevens wrote:
> Ok I've decided that for my purposes Kevin's BFSM will work fine.
> However, one thing that is odd is that in FireDaemon I selected
> "interact with desktop" which should enable the app to display it's
> interface, but none appears. It isn't really a problem tho, the server
> is configured and working, but I think that it is strange that no window
> is appearing when interact w/desktop is selected.. In the past in
> working with services I have used that option (not w/FireDaemon, but in
> the Service properties page) for apps that run as services and display a
> GUI. Anyways, like I said it does not really matter the server is working.
> Hammer 2.0 wrote:
>> Yep I use FireDaemon as well to keep an instance of BFSM running,
>> works like a charm and well worth the license fee. I use it for other
>> things too such as FTP's, IRC bots and TeamSpeak. FireDaemon si teh
>> shit I tells ya! :)
>>> From: Brigham Stevens <brs at vikingmind.com>
>>> Reply-To: bf1942 at icculus.org
>>> To: bf1942 at icculus.org
>>> Subject: [bf1942] BF1 Question : Using FireDaemon Pro to run bf1942?
>>> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:23:42 -0700
>>> A note from someone still running bf1942/DC servers :)
>>> I recently starting using FireDeamon to run my HL2 : source based
>>> servers.... Pretty damn nifty.
>>> Has anyone succeeded in using it to run BF1942? The bf server likes to
>>> quit itself and spawn more processes and I think FireDaemon has issues
>>> dealing with that, and in fact it will spawn a zillion of them... OUCH!
More information about the Bf1942