[bf1942] Being 'nice' to your servers
Rick Buford
rickbuford at greeblesnort.com
Tue Jan 28 23:20:31 EST 2003
you might have prioritized it over the network traffic itself =)
just a thought
Rick
Daniel Malmgren wrote:
> Well I used -20....my KDE was running choppy as heck. but I figured what
> the hay!
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Zachary Williams" <admin at ztnet.com>
> To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
> Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 7:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [bf1942] Being 'nice' to your servers
>
>
>
>>What did you use as highest priority? If you use 20, then you would be
>>going in the wrong direction. -19 is comonly the highest priority.
>
> (lower
>
>>the number, the higher the chance the process will get cycles over another
>>process)
>>
>>Zach
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Daniel Malmgren" <danielmalmgren at shaw.ca>
>>To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
>>Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 9:51 PM
>>Subject: Re: [bf1942] Being 'nice' to your servers
>>
>>
>>
>>>I tried running it the highest priority and not sure but it made my ping
>>>jump from 40 to 200+....ouch. And I have it running on my LAN lol!
>>>
>>>Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Alex Lembesis" <alex at elitedesigns.net>
>>>To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
>>>Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 8:11 AM
>>>Subject: RE: [bf1942] Being 'nice' to your servers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>No responses, U GUYS MAKE ME CRY! :`(
>>>>hehehe
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Alex Lembesis [mailto:alex at elitedesigns.net]
>>>>Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 11:12 PM
>>>>To: bf1942 at icculus.org
>>>>Subject: [bf1942] Being 'nice' to your servers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hey guys... just wondering if anyone here has ran their servers at a
>>>
>>>higher
>>>
>>>>priority than it usually does. What 'nice' did you use and did it
>
> help
>
>>>>increase performance?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
More information about the Bf1942
mailing list