[bf1942] Being 'nice' to your servers

Rick Buford rickbuford at greeblesnort.com
Tue Jan 28 23:20:31 EST 2003


you might have prioritized it over the network traffic itself =)

just a thought

Rick

Daniel Malmgren wrote:
> Well I used -20....my KDE was running choppy as heck.  but I figured what
> the hay!
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Zachary Williams" <admin at ztnet.com>
> To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
> Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 7:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [bf1942] Being 'nice' to your servers
> 
> 
> 
>>What did you use as highest priority?  If you use 20, then you would be
>>going in the wrong direction.  -19 is comonly the highest priority.
> 
> (lower
> 
>>the number, the higher the chance the process will get cycles over another
>>process)
>>
>>Zach
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Daniel Malmgren" <danielmalmgren at shaw.ca>
>>To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
>>Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 9:51 PM
>>Subject: Re: [bf1942] Being 'nice' to your servers
>>
>>
>>
>>>I tried running it the highest priority and not sure but it made my ping
>>>jump from 40 to 200+....ouch.  And I have it running on my LAN lol!
>>>
>>>Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Alex Lembesis" <alex at elitedesigns.net>
>>>To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
>>>Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 8:11 AM
>>>Subject: RE: [bf1942] Being 'nice' to your servers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>No responses, U GUYS MAKE ME CRY! :`(
>>>>hehehe
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Alex Lembesis [mailto:alex at elitedesigns.net]
>>>>Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 11:12 PM
>>>>To: bf1942 at icculus.org
>>>>Subject: [bf1942] Being 'nice' to your servers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hey guys... just wondering if anyone here has ran their servers at a
>>>
>>>higher
>>>
>>>>priority than it usually does.  What 'nice' did you use and did it
> 
> help
> 
>>>>increase performance?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 




More information about the Bf1942 mailing list