[bf1942] Being 'nice' to your servers

Daniel Malmgren danielmalmgren at shaw.ca
Sat Jan 25 22:06:22 EST 2003


Well I used -20....my KDE was running choppy as heck.  but I figured what
the hay!

Daniel



----- Original Message -----
From: "Zachary Williams" <admin at ztnet.com>
To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 7:07 PM
Subject: Re: [bf1942] Being 'nice' to your servers


> What did you use as highest priority?  If you use 20, then you would be
> going in the wrong direction.  -19 is comonly the highest priority.
(lower
> the number, the higher the chance the process will get cycles over another
> process)
>
> Zach
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daniel Malmgren" <danielmalmgren at shaw.ca>
> To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
> Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 9:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [bf1942] Being 'nice' to your servers
>
>
> > I tried running it the highest priority and not sure but it made my ping
> > jump from 40 to 200+....ouch.  And I have it running on my LAN lol!
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Alex Lembesis" <alex at elitedesigns.net>
> > To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 8:11 AM
> > Subject: RE: [bf1942] Being 'nice' to your servers
> >
> >
> > > No responses, U GUYS MAKE ME CRY! :`(
> > > hehehe
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Alex Lembesis [mailto:alex at elitedesigns.net]
> > > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 11:12 PM
> > > To: bf1942 at icculus.org
> > > Subject: [bf1942] Being 'nice' to your servers
> > >
> > >
> > > Hey guys... just wondering if anyone here has ran their servers at a
> > higher
> > > priority than it usually does.  What 'nice' did you use and did it
help
> > > increase performance?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>





More information about the Bf1942 mailing list