folderol at ukfsn.org
Thu Nov 29 16:43:07 EST 2007
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 04:31:19 +0100
Sebastian Joseph <cyberheroo at arcor.de> wrote:
> Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > Ian> So, should I take the extended silence as go-ahead to proceed?
> > Sebastian> I think, it is a good idea, but, if you will make it so, why
> > Sebastian> don`t create two pseudo-hooks with name login and logoff to
> > Sebastian> replace the ~/.config/openbox/autostart.sh?
> > I am not sure this is a good idea, for reasons related to Debian bug #452539.
> > To re-summarize: autostart.sh contains things that I put into ~/.xsession
> > instead, because I want them to run under _any_ window manager. So, when
> > my distro helpfully provides autostart.sh for me, I have to take special
> > steps to bypass it. I'd rather not have to do the same with the rc file.
> But may, some people wants to have special tools starting with openbox
> only. For example panels or something. I think, if you dont want to use
> rc.xml hooks, you don`t need to wrote them to the rc.xml file.
> Greetings Sebastian
Personally, I only use other window managers extremely rarely, and for
special reasons, so controls/effects linked tightly to openbox would
be a good thing (tm).
Will J Godfrey
More information about the openbox