[openbox] Redistributing the documentation
xor at orodu.net
Sun Jan 25 02:36:26 EST 2004
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 02:10:41PM +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
> Yes, as far as I've understood the GFDL fails the Debian Free Software
> Guidelines because of the so-called invariant sections. There is
> currently heavy debate regarding the "non-freeness" of a GFDL-licensed
> work which doesn't have any invariant sections, but it's a can of worms
> I'd rather not open.
Annoying :) And I'm considering taking law. Maybe I should rethink :P
> Preferably I'd just regard them as part of the Openbox source
> distribution and thus licensed under the GPL as Openbox itself, if this
> is okay with you?
That's fine by me.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the openbox