[Gtkradiant] svn://svn.icculus.org/gtkradiant

[Ellis Antaya]

Yeah i know it use to be there, but it now serves a 404 error.
Is the source code on github up to date?

---
Ellis
(Sent from my iPod)

On 2012-02-13, at 9:24, ailmanki <ailmanki at gmail.com> wrote:

> It was over-here:
> http://zerowing.idsoftware.com/bugzilla
> 
> 
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Ellis Antaya <ellis.antaya at gmail.com> wrote:
> is this what you are talking about ?
> 
> https://github.com/id-Software/GtkRadiant
> 
> it seem someone already put gtk-radiant on github 13 days ago ...
> 
> Ellis
> 1100101000111101
> " Unfortunately, no one can be told what The Matrix is.  You have to see it for yourself. "
> twitter.com/floverdevel
> facebook.com/ellis.antaya
> google.com/profiles/ellis.antaya
> linkedin.com/in/ellisantaya
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 03:45, ailmanki <ailmanki at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have thought kinda to long about this, sorry for late reply.
> Maybe more people would continue development, if there would be a list of bugs and feature requests.
> 
> What I want to say with all that, is that I believe a Bugtracker/Tickettracker would help attracting Developers. The inverse leads to loosing knowledge, no developers = no bugtracker, developers = new bugtracker.
> (I kinda often find google linking me to the old zerowing bugtracker which has vanished).
> I understand there is one huge problem, it needs at least one administrating that tracker, and I guess the developers should do that, so we end up with no developers - no bugtracker.
> 
> 
> In that case, yes a list of all Forks would be excellent, the ones I know of:
> 
> For Zeroradiant:
> A thread on Quake3 world:
> http://quake3world.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=45439
> 
> UfoRadiant:
> http://ufoai.ninex.info/wiki/index.php/Download
> 
> NetRadiant:
> http://git.icculus.org/?p=divverent/netradiant.git
> (Following link I suppose is not save for the future I guess; thats why I think the link to the git is better)
> http://dev.alientrap.org/wiki/netradiant
> 
> 
> Thanks you in any case
> ailmanki
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Ben Noordhuis <info at bnoordhuis.nl> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 16:15, Timothee Besset <ttimo at ttimo.net> wrote:
> > I think that would make sense if there were active developers.
> > Rambetter was the last active contributor, and I'm not sure if he
> > plans to do anything further with the current release. If he does then
> > getting a bug tracker up somewhere could be good.
> >
> > My primary goal at this point is to safekeep the source code and the
> > 1.4 / 1.5 / 1.6 release lines somewhere. I just don't have the time or
> > interest to further the development at this point. There is a number
> > of forks of this code, I would like to keep track of them and have
> > this list act as a general hub if that makes any sense.
> >
> > TTimo
> 
> Can you mirror (or move) the code on GitHub? I (and presumably others)
> would contribute more if there was a simple "fork, hack, send pull
> request" cycle.
> _______________________________________________
> Gtkradiant mailing list
> Gtkradiant at icculus.org
> http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkradiant
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gtkradiant mailing list
> Gtkradiant at icculus.org
> http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkradiant
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gtkradiant mailing list
> Gtkradiant at icculus.org
> http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkradiant
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gtkradiant mailing list
> Gtkradiant at icculus.org
> http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkradiant
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/gtkradiant/attachments/20120223/dc49ee11/attachment.htm>