[Gtkradiant] svn://svn.icculus.org/gtkradiant

[ailmanki]

It was over-here:
http://zerowing.idsoftware.com/bugzilla


On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Ellis Antaya <ellis.antaya at gmail.com>wrote:

> is this what you are talking about ?
>
> https://github.com/id-Software/GtkRadiant
>
> it seem someone already put gtk-radiant on github 13 days ago ...
>
> Ellis
> 1100101000111101
> " Unfortunately, no one can be told what The Matrix is.  You have to see
> it for yourself. "
> twitter.com/floverdevel
> facebook.com/ellis.antaya
> google.com/profiles/ellis.antaya
> linkedin.com/in/ellisantaya
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 03:45, ailmanki <ailmanki at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have thought kinda to long about this, sorry for late reply.
>> Maybe more people would continue development, if there would be a list of
>> bugs and feature requests.
>>
>> What I want to say with all that, is that I believe a
>> Bugtracker/Tickettracker would help attracting Developers. The inverse
>> leads to loosing knowledge, no developers = no bugtracker, developers = new
>> bugtracker.
>> (I kinda often find google linking me to the old zerowing bugtracker
>> which has vanished).
>> I understand there is one huge problem, it needs at least one
>> administrating that tracker, and I guess the developers should do that, so
>> we end up with no developers - no bugtracker.
>>
>>
>> In that case, yes a list of all Forks would be excellent, the ones I know
>> of:
>>
>> For Zeroradiant:
>> A thread on Quake3 world:
>> http://quake3world.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=45439
>>
>> UfoRadiant:
>> http://ufoai.ninex.info/wiki/index.php/Download
>>
>> NetRadiant:
>> http://git.icculus.org/?p=divverent/netradiant.git
>> (Following link I suppose is not save for the future I guess; thats why I
>> think the link to the git is better)
>> http://dev.alientrap.org/wiki/netradiant
>>
>>
>> Thanks you in any case
>> ailmanki
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Ben Noordhuis <info at bnoordhuis.nl> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 16:15, Timothee Besset <ttimo at ttimo.net> wrote:
>>> > I think that would make sense if there were active developers.
>>> > Rambetter was the last active contributor, and I'm not sure if he
>>> > plans to do anything further with the current release. If he does then
>>> > getting a bug tracker up somewhere could be good.
>>> >
>>> > My primary goal at this point is to safekeep the source code and the
>>> > 1.4 / 1.5 / 1.6 release lines somewhere. I just don't have the time or
>>> > interest to further the development at this point. There is a number
>>> > of forks of this code, I would like to keep track of them and have
>>> > this list act as a general hub if that makes any sense.
>>> >
>>> > TTimo
>>>
>>> Can you mirror (or move) the code on GitHub? I (and presumably others)
>>> would contribute more if there was a simple "fork, hack, send pull
>>> request" cycle.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gtkradiant mailing list
>>> Gtkradiant at icculus.org
>>> http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkradiant
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gtkradiant mailing list
>> Gtkradiant at icculus.org
>> http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkradiant
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gtkradiant mailing list
> Gtkradiant at icculus.org
> http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkradiant
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/gtkradiant/attachments/20120213/6126bcec/attachment-0001.htm>