[Gtkradiant] RE: JK support in GtkRadiant - current plans?

[ydnar]

Do the compiling tools differ significantly from their Quake 3 ancestors?

IIRC, the only significant difference for compiling EF maps was a few
surfaceflags (ladder/forcefield).

y


----- Original Message -----
From: "Monroe, James" <jmonroe@ravensoft.com>
To: "'Timothee Besset'" <ttimo@idsoftware.com>; "Monroe, James"
<jmonroe@ravensoft.com>
Cc: <gtkradiant@zerowing.idsoftware.com>
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 8:21 AM
Subject: [Gtkradiant] RE: JK support in GtkRadiant - current plans?


> I plan to release our version of radiant with all the ents and tools
needed
> ... very soon.  I just have to take care of getting a demo out first.  I
> want to do everything possible to make it easy for people to edit maps.
>
> -James
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Timothee Besset [mailto:ttimo@idsoftware.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 4:01 AM
> To: jmonroe@ravensoft.com
> Cc: gtkradiant@zerowing.idsoftware.com
> Subject: JK support in GtkRadiant - current plans?
>
> Hey there
>
> Good job on JKII .. got my copy yesterday and I'm enjoying it. We are
> getting a bunch of requests for JKII support in GtkRadiant already. We are
> probably going to throw in a few resources to add the appropriate
> functionality to GtkRadiant and provide a package if possible. Can you let
> us know what the current plan is, or forward to who takes care of that?
>
> regards
>
> TTimo
>
> PS: I have put our public mailing list on CC here to update them on the
> status of JKII support investigations .. you might want to reply only to
> me if there are some NDA matters :-)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gtkradiant mailing list
> Gtkradiant@zerowing.idsoftware.com
> http://zerowing.idsoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/gtkradiant
>