[ut2004] missing eyecandy with openGL?

Felix Maibaum f.maibaum at web.de
Fri Mar 26 07:45:10 EST 2004

Am Friday 26 March 2004 13:18 schrieb Andrew Pilley:
> It's probably not impossible to get them to act the same, but the extra
> effort that daniel vogel would have to put in, vs the amount of benefit
> AND the cpu hit it'd cause are probably leaning in favour of saving
> time, at this point.

too bad, I think especially shadows make a world look so much more alive. I 
don't know how much effort would be needed for the implementation. But at 
least concerning the CPU hit I think everybody should be able to decide for 

More information about the ut2004 mailing list