[ut2004] OpenAL questions

Sebastien Chaumat schaumat at free.fr
Sat Apr 24 03:57:12 EDT 2004


Le ven 23/04/2004 à 18:48, Ryan C. Gordon a écrit :

> Again, please don't swap out libraries unless you have a good reason; we
> shipped with those specific builds for a reason!
> 

Well look at those benchs :

dm-rankin debian unstable libsdl1.2
13.859163 / 42.669430 / 120.772758 fps
Score = 42.643993

dm-rankin ut2004 retail libsdl1.2
4.193809 / 43.037064 / 101.994865 fps
Score = 43.003017

sound system is OSS on a 2.4.26 + lowlatency kernel.

max framerate is 20% higher with the distro sdl while the min framerate
is dropping to low with the provided sdl. Mean fps is unchanged.

What were the changes in the SDL for ut2004 ? Are they all commited back
to SDL cvs ?

SEb






More information about the ut2004 mailing list