Small memory-leak in MOD decoder

Torbjörn Andersson torbjorn.e.andersson at
Mon Oct 1 07:57:04 EDT 2001

Max Horn wrote:

 > If somebody could tell me what we are talking about here, sure, I will
 > look at it :) I read the mails about the MP3-ness chaeck, but how is
 > this related to libtool ??!? what libtool patch?!?

You're right, they're not related. I was just lumping them together as 
two items that have been discussed but not yet committed to CVS. :-)

 > You mean CVS rev 1.1 vs 1.2 of acinclude.m4, and 1.2 is not working -
 > well, it contains libtool.m4. But one could argue whether that is a
 > good idea, since we require libtool anyway... I think it is better to
 > add a comment regarding this to the readme, and get rid of libtool.m4
 > in acinclude - this way both users of 1.3.x and 1.4.x can be happy.

Or the bootstrap script could be made to construct the appropriate 
acinclude.m4 depending on what "libtool --version" says, I guess. Might 
be overkill though.

Torbjörn Andersson

More information about the sdlsound mailing list