[quake3] Re: removing jpeglib from svn

[Jamie Wilkinson]

This one time, at band camp, Tim Angus wrote:
>On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 09:46:01 +1000 Jamie wrote:
>> Oh; your comments recently about stripping non-bytecode support from
>> q3lcc seemed to indicate you felt otherwise.  Thanks for the
>> clarification.
>
>The non-bytecode support in q3lcc is completely unnecessary and unused,
>whereas jpeg support is fundamentally necessary and used throughout.
>Messing with the unused portions of q3lcc is not at all analogous to
>changing the jpeg code.

You misread me.  I meant that the general cleanup of code suggested to me
that the project also wanted to reduce maintenance by not having its own
fork of third party libraries.

Do you also plan to include all of SDL in the source?  When the OpenAL patch
is merged, do you plan to ship the openal library also?