[physfs] PhysFS C++ Wrapper
kip at thevertigo.com
Mon Jul 19 20:19:00 EDT 2010
On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 08:50 +0200, Christoph Nelles wrote:
> The implementation from supertux has the most important feature: It's
> tested and known to work (at least for supertux ;)). I just looked
> (~60sec) over the code and it's much smaller than my implementation,
> don't know if it's good (simplicity) or bad (missing functionality?).
That's helpful to know. The non-SuperTux implementation looks newer, but
as you say, supertux has probably been tested more rigorously.
> I had really problems implementing the ios stuff even after reading many
> sites (especially http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/iostream/), guides
> and even books. The thing is, in the supertux implementation is the
> basic stuff (overflow, underflow, sync) every guide teaches, perhaps
> only these parts are really needed, but i think it's not complete.
> Haven't seen anything related to this stupid putback buffer.
Fair enough. Unless anyone has anything else to add, I think I will end
up going with the SuperTux implementation.
Kip Warner -- Software Engineer
OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail preferred
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the physfs