[physfs] 2.0 wishlist...
Ryan C. Gordon
icculus at clutteredmind.org
Tue Sep 21 13:50:19 EDT 2004
> That's possible, but since physfs has to support Windows, implementing
> nbio is going to be a tough sell since it won't be portable.
> Threading, for all its foibles, is conceptually more portable for
> physfs since it doesn't have to get into that business at all.
We can probably accomplish this without too much heartache, but I need
to dig around on MSDN a little.
More information about the physfs