[physfs] 2.0 wishlist...

Ryan C. Gordon icculus at clutteredmind.org
Tue Sep 21 13:50:19 EDT 2004

> That's possible, but since physfs has to support Windows, implementing 
> nbio is going to be a tough sell since it won't be portable.  
> Threading, for all its foibles, is conceptually more portable for 
> physfs since it doesn't have to get into that business at all.

We can probably accomplish this without too much heartache, but I need 
to dig around on MSDN a little.


More information about the physfs mailing list