[physfs] 2.0 wishlist...

Brian Hook hook_l at pyrogon.com
Tue Sep 21 13:19:50 EDT 2004

> Hmm, actually, don't know.  I was thinking unixentrically again...
> I assumed mingw32 managed to do it, but I don't think it does.
> That doesn't stop me lusting after non-blocking IO though.

That's possible, but since physfs has to support Windows, implementing 
nbio is going to be a tough sell since it won't be portable.  
Threading, for all its foibles, is conceptually more portable for 
physfs since it doesn't have to get into that business at all.


More information about the physfs mailing list