[lokisetup] copy file patch

Stéphane Peter megastep at megastep.org
Tue Jan 31 20:42:55 EST 2006

Exactly, I was going to say that. I really need to retain the ability  
to build static binaries with GTK 1.x for now. I am shipping some  
installers on some non-Linux systems that need it done this way, and  
that's the main reason I haven't bothered porting to GTK 2.x for now.

I guess before I merge this we'll have to make sure that both  
versions can coexist, which can be quite messy. I was planning on  
waiting on the Setup 2.0 rewrite to do this, but I got once again  
sidetracked. :-/

On Jan 31, 2006, at 5:35 PM, Jeremy White wrote:

> I'd really appreciate the review.  I was going fairly fast
> and loose, and should probably submit a patch that's
> a bit cleaner.
> I also have to admit that it might be better if
> the patch were formulated so that gtk 1 remained
> a choice; gtk1 has the distinct advantage that you
> can link it statically.
> Cheers,
> Jeremy
> Stéphane Peter wrote:
>> Sorry for the delay, I was off on vacation for a while.
>> I'm going to merge these patches, though I'll have to first  
>> review  the
>> Gtk2 patch to make sure it doesn't break anything for now. The  other
>> patches should be in very shortly though.
>> Thanks!
>> On Jan 19, 2006, at 10:01 AM, Jeremy White wrote:
>>> If we use the inrpm flag, we may still need a files element
>>> for other operations.
>> [...]
>> -- 
>> Stéphane Peter
>> megastep at megastep.org

Stéphane Peter
megastep at megastep.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/lokisetup/attachments/20060131/6c201ed0/attachment.htm>

More information about the Lokisetup mailing list