[cod] Laag with 1.7 Linux Servers? - possible Fix included!!!

Wed Jul 9 04:34:43 EDT 2008

I will try these when I get into my shop tomorrow. And the real test 
will be this weekend at my weekly Mini-LAN
Thanks....
----
Vernon */"Twizted"/*Gibson

| SVP - Sales - Tech - Webmaster | www.DragonModz.net |
| tel. 715-338-2459 | twizted at DragonModz.net |

DragonModz.net - /Original Modding accessories, By Modders, For Modders/

/Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does 
not waive any related rights and obligations. It is intended for the 
named recipient(s) only. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail 
or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is 
unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by 
return e-mail or otherwise) immediately and do not disclose the contents 
to anyone or make copies./

Thomas Toka / www.serverman.de wrote:
> Hello again...
>
> Thank you all for your feedback.
>
> It think i have "buffered" the laags with some settings.
> I know what these settings do, so please dont tell me that
> there is no log or PB-Screens after this. *lol*
> As for now if you are affected by this issue please try to only
> change these parameters an check if there is less laag:
>
> server.cfg (changes)
> set g_logsync "0"
> set logfile "0"
>
> pbsv.cfg (change)
> pb_sv_AutoSs 0
>
> pbsv.cfg (add)
> pb_sv_cvar snaps IN 20 60 // prevents artificial lag
> pb_sv_cvar cl_timenudge IN -50 0 // prevents artificial lag
> pb_sv_cvar cg_bobup IN 0 0.005 // prevents bobup exploit
> pb_sv_cvar com_maxfps OUT 1 30 // prevents artificial lag
> pb_sv_cvar sv_padpackets IN 0 // prevents artificial lag
> pb_sv_cvar cg_shadows IN 0 1 // prevents shadows wallhack
> pb_sv_cvar r_znear IN 4 // prevents potential code hack
> pb_sv_cvar r_shownormals IN 0 // prevents potential code hack
> pb_sv_cvar r_nocurves IN 0 // prevents potential code hack
> pb_sv_cvar cm_oncurves IN 0 // prevents potential code hack
> pb_sv_cvar cm_noAreas IN 0 // prevents potential code hack
>
> Please give me a feedack.
>
> My Clan Mates said it works well!
>
> Regards
>
> Thomas Toka aka Tom-i
> www.serverman.de
>
>
>
> MaydaX schrieb:
>> http://www.pbbans.com/mbi-viewban-5ff15eb7-vb76958.html
>>
>> As you can see the maximum resolution allowed to be captured has been 
>> increased. I can not go into details at this time as PBBans have been 
>> asked by EB to keep the details of the changes we requested quiet 
>> while its tested for bugs.
>>
>> One downside of using larger resolutions at this time is it can take 
>> upwards of 5-7 minutes to receive a PBSS from the client.
>>
>> MaydaX
>> PBBans Developer
>>
>>
>> Tyson wrote:
>>> The max resolution has not changed. It is all about sample rates.
>>>
>>> The higher the sample rates the bigger the screen size with less 
>>> details you
>>> can achieve.
>>>
>>> My Opinion you people need to go back to the PsB cfg's recommended 
>>> settings
>>> and start moving the capture area around to get different areas of 
>>> the game
>>> screen. Alternatively, follow this guide to get the best shot at the 
>>> size
>>> you want.
>>> http://www.punksbusted.com/wiki/index.php/PB_Screenshot_Setup
>>>
>>> The max is still 8200 pixels divided evenly between your width and 
>>> height.
>>> If you use oddball sizes, you are going to get weird results.
>>>
>>> Tyson
>>> Twisted Gaming Service
>>> http://www.twistedgamingservice.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: MaydaX [mailto:maydaxone at gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 
>>> 2008 11:43 AM
>>> To: cod at icculus.org
>>> Subject: Re: [cod] Laag with 1.7 Linux Servers?
>>>
>>> The 1.7 patch had nothing to do with the higher PBSS resolutions, it 
>>> was a PB client update that enabled them. The transfer rate for 
>>> sending the PBSS from client to the server still remains the same.
>>>
>>> MaydaX
>>>
>>> Guðmundur Örn Ingvarsson wrote:
>>>  
>>>> Could it be that pbss is now taking ss in the resolution we specify 
>>>> and
>>>>     
>>> then compressing them?
>>>  
>>>> I had this set
>>>> pb_sv_ssheight 768     //[Requested pixel height of remote 
>>>> screenshots]
>>>> pb_sv_sswidth 1024      //[Requested pixel width of remote 
>>>> screenshots]
>>>>
>>>> And after patch 1.7 I see more of the screen of players than before 
>>>> even
>>>>     
>>> though the pictures is still 512x384
>>>  
>>>> Bigger ss, bigger impact on network
>>>>  
>>>>     
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> To unsubscribe, send a blank email to cod-unsubscribe at icculus.org
>>> Mailing list archives: http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> To unsubscribe, send a blank email to cod-unsubscribe at icculus.org
>>> Mailing list archives: http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>
>
> ---
> To unsubscribe, send a blank email to cod-unsubscribe at icculus.org
> Mailing list archives: http://icculus.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-cgi?38
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/cod/attachments/20080709/3b32affa/attachment.htm>