[cod] Some feedback on 1.41d

Sat Sep 25 18:29:14 EDT 2004

Seriously, I think it's truely four.  I understand virtual CPUs and all, 
but usually proc and dmesg don't lie to me.:P.

INFO --

processor       : 0
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 15
model           : 2
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz
stepping        : 9
cpu MHz         : 2392.119
cache size      : 512 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 2
runqueue        : 0
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 2
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge 
mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
bogomips        : 4771.02

processor       : 1
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 15
model           : 2
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz
stepping        : 9
cpu MHz         : 2392.119
cache size      : 512 KB
physical id     : 3
siblings        : 2
runqueue        : 1
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 2
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge 
mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
bogomips        : 4771.02

processor       : 2
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 15
model           : 2
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz
stepping        : 9
cpu MHz         : 2392.119
cache size      : 512 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 2
runqueue        : 0
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 2
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge 
mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
bogomips        : 4771.02

processor       : 3
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 15
model           : 2
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz
stepping        : 9
cpu MHz         : 2392.119
cache size      : 512 KB
physical id     : 3
siblings        : 2
runqueue        : 1
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 2
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge 
mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
bogomips        : 4771.02

AND

CPU: Trace cache: 12K uops, L1 D cache: 8K
CPU: L2 cache: 512K
CPU: Physical Processor ID: 3
Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#3.
CPU:     After generic, caps: bfebfbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
CPU:             Common caps: bfebfbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
CPU3: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz stepping 09
..... CPU clock speed is 2392.0218 MHz.
cpu: 0, clocks: 1328899, slice: 265779
CPU0<T0:1328896,T1:1063104,D:13,S:265779,C:1328899>
cpu: 1, clocks: 1328899, slice: 265779
cpu: 2, clocks: 1328899, slice: 265779
cpu: 3, clocks: 1328899, slice: 265779
CPU1<T0:1328896,T1:797328,D:10,S:265779,C:1328899>
CPU2<T0:1328896,T1:531552,D:7,S:265779,C:1328899>
CPU3<T0:1328896,T1:265776,D:4,S:265779,C:1328899>
cpu_sibling_map[0] = 2
cpu_sibling_map[1] = 3
cpu_sibling_map[2] = 0
cpu_sibling_map[3] = 1
mapping CPU#0's runqueue to CPU#2's runqueue.
mapping CPU#1's runqueue to CPU#3's runqueue.
Starting migration thread for cpu 0
Starting migration thread for cpu 1
Starting migration thread for cpu 2
Starting migration thread for cpu 3

I'm just going on what I can physically see.

Jay Vasallo wrote:

> Did I read that wrong or do you have four?
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jay Vasallo" <haze at clanwarz.net>
> To: <cod at icculus.org>
> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 5:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [cod] Some feedback on 1.41d
>
>
>> You have two cpu's . This is what Steve was trying to say to you.
>> By placing hyperthreading on you seeing this virtual memory report.
>>
>> HyperThreading equals two virtual cpu's thus you get this virtual 
>> memory and processing feedback.
>>
>> But still nice system. I like the fact that you can fit so many 
>> servers and still be ok on processing. This is good news.
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Hunkeler" 
>> <wolve at dodfrontline.com>
>> To: <cod at icculus.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 3:11 PM
>> Subject: Re: [cod] Some feedback on 1.41d
>>
>>
>>> Specs --
>>> Motherboard:  Supermicro \ Dual Xeon SATA \ X5DPA-TGM
>>> Processor type:  Intel \ P4 Xeon 2.4Ghz \ 533mhz FSB Socket604
>>> Memory:  (two sticks) Transcend \ 512MB \ DDR266 ECC Registered
>>> HDD:  (two) Seagate \ 80GB:IDE:7200RPM Barracuda \ ST380011a
>>> OS:  RedHat Enterprise [not my choice of distros]
>>>
>>> It performs great...  We're running a semi-public file repository, 5 
>>> game servers, and 2 Teamspeak servers.  Not shabby if you ask me :).
>>> I guess if you wanted to check out how it really performs for gaming 
>>> you can connect via the CoD:UO console with > /connect 
>>> pubuo.3rd-infantry-division.net
>>>
>>> We're hosted with www.theplanet.com if anyone wants to check them 
>>> out as well...  Their tech support staff is second to none IMO.
>>>
>>> Jay Vasallo wrote:
>>>
>>>> What type of mb is this on? Can you share Link? Also how does this 
>>>> beast perform on a game that you have running?
>>>> Please share if you don't mind. Knowledge is great. ;-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Hunkeler" 
>>>> <wolve at dodfrontline.com>
>>>> To: <cod at icculus.org>
>>>> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 2:30 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [cod] Some feedback on 1.41d
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> She is a beast :D...  I love her.  If only going to 2.6.8.1-ck8 
>>>>> was easy. I'd rather not build the kernel, reboot and have a 
>>>>> paperweight lol.
>>>>>
>>>>> Steven Hartland wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hehe nice machine then, bet its a big beast :)
>>>>>> As long as we are all on the same page that's good :D
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Steve / K
>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Hunkeler" 
>>>>>> <wolve at dodfrontline.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I get what you're saying.  Alright, from now on I'll just report 
>>>>>>> the real CPU usage.  Although it would make sense for the total 
>>>>>>> usage to report the true overall usage of the 4 CPUs.  It's not 
>>>>>>> a 2 CPU 2 Virtual system though, the specs actually read quad.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ================================================
>>>>>> This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) 
>>>>>> Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the 
>>>>>> event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, 
>>>>>> copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any 
>>>>>> information contained in it.
>>>>>> In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete 
>>>>>> transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137
>>>>>> or return the E.mail to postmaster at multiplay.co.uk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>