[cod] Some feedback on 1.41d

[Jay Vasallo]

Did I read that wrong or do you have four?



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jay Vasallo" <haze at clanwarz.net>
To: <cod at icculus.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: [cod] Some feedback on 1.41d


> You have two cpu's . This is what Steve was trying to say to you.
> By placing hyperthreading on you seeing this virtual memory report.
>
> HyperThreading equals two virtual cpu's thus you get this virtual memory 
> and processing feedback.
>
> But still nice system. I like the fact that you can fit so many servers 
> and still be ok on processing. This is good news.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Joe Hunkeler" <wolve at dodfrontline.com>
> To: <cod at icculus.org>
> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 3:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [cod] Some feedback on 1.41d
>
>
>> Specs --
>> Motherboard:  Supermicro \ Dual Xeon SATA \ X5DPA-TGM
>> Processor type:  Intel \ P4 Xeon 2.4Ghz \ 533mhz FSB Socket604
>> Memory:  (two sticks) Transcend \ 512MB \ DDR266 ECC Registered
>> HDD:  (two) Seagate \ 80GB:IDE:7200RPM Barracuda \ ST380011a
>> OS:  RedHat Enterprise [not my choice of distros]
>>
>> It performs great...  We're running a semi-public file repository, 5 game 
>> servers, and 2 Teamspeak servers.  Not shabby if you ask me :).
>> I guess if you wanted to check out how it really performs for gaming you 
>> can connect via the CoD:UO console with > /connect 
>> pubuo.3rd-infantry-division.net
>>
>> We're hosted with www.theplanet.com if anyone wants to check them out as 
>> well...  Their tech support staff is second to none IMO.
>>
>> Jay Vasallo wrote:
>>
>>> What type of mb is this on? Can you share Link? Also how does this beast 
>>> perform on a game that you have running?
>>> Please share if you don't mind. Knowledge is great. ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Hunkeler" 
>>> <wolve at dodfrontline.com>
>>> To: <cod at icculus.org>
>>> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 2:30 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [cod] Some feedback on 1.41d
>>>
>>>
>>>> She is a beast :D...  I love her.  If only going to 2.6.8.1-ck8 was 
>>>> easy. I'd rather not build the kernel, reboot and have a paperweight 
>>>> lol.
>>>>
>>>> Steven Hartland wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hehe nice machine then, bet its a big beast :)
>>>>> As long as we are all on the same page that's good :D
>>>>>
>>>>>    Steve / K
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Hunkeler" 
>>>>> <wolve at dodfrontline.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I get what you're saying.  Alright, from now on I'll just report the 
>>>>>> real CPU usage.  Although it would make sense for the total usage to 
>>>>>> report the true overall usage of the 4 CPUs.  It's not a 2 CPU 2 
>>>>>> Virtual system though, the specs actually read quad.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ================================================
>>>>> This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. 
>>>>> and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of 
>>>>> misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, 
>>>>> printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in 
>>>>> it.
>>>>> In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission 
>>>>> please telephone (023) 8024 3137
>>>>> or return the E.mail to postmaster at multiplay.co.uk.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>