[cod] CoD and my struggle with NAT
Boy_One (COD System Admin)
cod at kaleplek.net
Sat Jan 10 12:09:23 EST 2004
He guys, a little update. After a while i can connect again, but when i try
to connect after that no luck. So i tried how long it will take and it's
abot 2 minutes. So i'm happy so far but this is still a little bug, can this
be solved????
Regards
Quint
----- Original Message -----
From: "Boy_One (COD System Admin)" <cod at kaleplek.net>
To: <cod at icculus.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 15:20
Subject: Re: [cod] CoD and my struggle with NAT
> Almost there...
>
> I did what you say and restarted the server. I got in once and after that
no
> luck. So i restarted again and yes i got in once and after that no luck...
I
> get the cd-kay autho again.
>
> Can anybody tell me if the set net_lanauthorize 0 is set back on 1???
>
> Regards
> Quint
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bryan Kuhn" <bryan at infinityward.com>
> To: <cod at icculus.org>
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 20:01
> Subject: Re: [cod] CoD and my struggle with NAT
>
>
> > Don't use developer. I bet it will work once you turn that off, there
> > might be a slight delay when you first connect though.
> >
> > Friday, January 9, 2004, 10:53:34 AM, you wrote:
> > > Here are all my settings i run on my server.
> >
> > > Startup line : /games/cod/cod_lnxded +set logfile 2 +set developer 2
> +set
> > > dedicated 2 +set netp_ip 62.216.16.89 +ip 62.216.16.89 +set ttycon 0
> +exec
> > > quint.cfg
> >
> > > quint.cfg (i know i like to use my own name... LoL)
> >
> > > // GENERAL SETTINGS
> > > // seta sv_mapRotation "gametype tdm map mp_omaha gametype tdm map
> evreux
> > > gametype tdm map farm2 gametype tdm map fivepoints gametype tdm map
> mp_mink
> > > gametype tdm map mp_v2 gametype tdm map Neverland gametype tdm map
> > > Portvillage gametype tdm map street gametype dm map DM_Fort gametype
tdm
> map
> > > mp_riveredge gametype tdm map mp_berlin gametype tdm map mp_pegasusday
> > > gametype tdm map mp_tanktown gametype tdm map mp_panzerbunker gametype
> tdm
> > > map farm gametype tdm map mp_brecourt gametype tdm mp_pegasusnight
> gametype
> > > tdm map mp_carentan gametype tdm map mp_chateau gametype tdm map
> > > mp_dawnville gametype tdm map mp_depot gametype tdm map mp_harbor
> gametype
> > > tdm map mp_hurtgen gametype tdm map mp_pavlov gametype tdm map
> mp_powcamp
> > > gametype tdm map mp_railyard gametype tdm map mp_rocket gametype tdm
map
> > > mp_ship "
> > > seta sv_mapRotation "gametype tdm map mp_brecourt gametype gametype
tdm
> map
> > > mp_carentan gametype tdm map mp_chateau gametype tdm map mp_dawnville
> > > gametype tdm map mp_depot gametype tdm map mp_harbor gametype tdm map
> > > mp_hurtgen gametype tdm map mp_pavlov gametype tdm map mp_powcamp
> gametype
> > > tdm map mp_railyard gametype tdm map mp_rocket gametype tdm map
mp_ship
> "
> > > set sv_hostname "---> Little Fun Dutch Linux Server <---"
> > > set scr_motd "Welcome to the dutch Hell Hole!"
> > > set rconPassword "xxxxxxxxxx"
> > > set g_privatepassword "xxxxxxx"
> > > set scr_friendlyfire "0"
> > > set sv_cheats "0"
> > > seta sv_maxclients "12"
> > > set sv_maxping "200"
> > > set sv_gamespy 1
> > > seta sv_gamespy 1
> > > seta dedicated 2
> > > set dedicated 2
> > > set g_allowvote "0"
> > > set scr_allow_vote "0"
> > > seta sv_privateclients "2"
> > > set sv_allowDownload "0"
> >
> > > // WEAPONS SETTINGS
> > > seta scr_allow_bar "1"
> > > seta scr_allow_mp40 "1"
> > > seta scr_allow_mp44 "1"
> > > seta scr_allow_ppsh "1"
> > > seta scr_allow_sten "1"
> > > seta scr_allow_thompson "1"
> > > seta scr_allow_bren "1"
> > > seta scr_allow_m1garand "1"
> > > seta scr_allow_nagant "1"
> > > seta scr_allow_enfield "1"
> > > seta scr_allow_kar98k "1"
> > > seta scr_allow_m1carbine "1"
> > > seta scr_allow_kar98ksniper "1"
> > > seta scr_allow_springfield "1"
> > > seta scr_allow_fg42 "0"
> > > seta scr_allow_panzerfaust "1"
> >
> > > //pk3 settings and messages en wat prive dingen
> >
> > > //Kill cam-spectate mod + how-to
> >
> > > set g_ioteamspec 1 // 1 = Teamonly
> spectate 0
> > > = spectate all
> > > set g_ioteamspec "1" // 1 = Teamonly
> spectate 0
> > > = spectate all
> > > set g_iokillcam 1 // 1 = killcam on 0 =
> > > killcam off
> > > set g_iokillcam "1" // 1 = killcam on 0
=
> > > killcam off
> >
> > > seta sv_linerd1 "Welcome to ---> Little Fun Dutch Linux Server <---"
> > > seta sv_linerd2 "Server Admin Boy_One and Padjepuf"
> > > seta sv_linerd3 "Home of -> SE Easy CLAN <-"
> > > seta sv_linerd4 "For any questions please contact us at: Server Admin
> email:
> > > cod at kaleplek.net"
> > > seta sv_rddelay "10"
> >
> > > seta sv_master1 "codmaster.activision.com"
> > > seta sv_master2 "master0.gamespy.com"
> > > seta sv_master3 "master1.gamespy.com"
> > > seta sv_master4 "clanservers.net
> > > // set net_lanauthorize 0
> >
> > > // ADVANCED SETTINGS
> > > seta net_port "28960"
> > > seta scr_forcerespawn "0"
> > > seta sv_floodprotect "1"
> > > seta developer "2"
> > > seta pure "1"
> > > seta g_log "qconsole.log"
> > > seta scr_drawfriend "0"
> > > seta sv_fps "20"
> > > set sv_maxrate "2100"
> >
> > > // GAMETYPE - SPECIFIC SETTINGS
> > > seta scr_dm_scorelimit "50"
> > > seta scr_dm_timelimit "30"
> > > seta scr_tdm_scorelimit "250"
> > > seta scr_tdm_timelimit "20"
> > > seta scr_sd_scorelimit "10"
> > > seta scr_sd_timelimit "0"
> > > seta scr_sd_graceperiod "15"
> > > seta scr_sd_roundlength "4"
> > > seta scr_sd_roundlimit "0"
> > > seta scr_bel_alivepointtime "10"
> > > seta scr_bel_timelimit "30"
> > > seta scr_bel_scorelimit "50"
> > > seta scr_re_showcarrier "0"
> > > seta scr_re_scorelimit "0"
> > > seta scr_re_timelimit "0"
> > > seta scr_re_graceperiod "15"
> > > seta scr_re_roundlength "4"
> > > seta scr_re_roundlimit "0"
> >
> > > // CUSTOM ENTRY
> >
> > > seta scr_motd "Welcome to the dutch Hell Hole!"
> > > // Please leave the above line in or somehow acknowledge you have used
> this
> > > program, thanks.
> >
> > > // START MAP CYCLE
> > > map_rotate
> >
> >
> > > Regards
> > > Quint
> >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Bryan Kuhn" <bryan at infinityward.com>
> > > To: <cod at icculus.org>
> > > Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 19:09
> > > Subject: Re: [cod] CoD and my struggle with NAT
> >
> >
> > >> Are you running developer 1? I have a hard time getting it to happen
> > >> with developer off.
> > >>
> > >> Friday, January 9, 2004, 4:08:57 AM, you wrote:
> > >> > Yeah..... That's exactly my problem a multihomed network for public
> use,
> > >> > and no connection from private network... Thanks for looking at
> this...
> > >> > I hope it's going to be fixed. If you need a testserver/testclient
or
> > > what
> > >> > else... Here i am......
> > >>
> > >> >> Its only multihomed servers with public and private interfaces. It
> even
> > >> >> works correctly over a vpn with 2 different private networks. This
> > > isn't
> > >> >> that common except for people running small private servers
> > >> >> which could just be run as dedicated 1.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Friday, January 9, 2004, 12:59:14 AM, you wrote:
> > >> >>> Bryan,
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> we have been posting this issue for a long time. It would be
really
> > >> >>> great if it got addressed. I am really surprised that this was
> never
> > >> >>> tested. Very few companies used public IP address for internal
> LANs.
> > >> >>> All of them use non-public addresses (i.e. 192.168.0.0).
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> I also think this applies to the Windows version.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> Bryan Kuhn said:
> > >> >>>> I think I finally reproed this. No promises it gets fixed or
> anything
> > >> >>>> though.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >> >>>> From: Eduardo E. Silva [mailto:esilva at silvex.com]
> > >> >>>> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:01 PM
> > >> >>>> To: cod at icculus.org
> > >> >>>> Subject: RE: Re[2]: [cod] CoD and my struggle with NAT
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Bryan, I have mine set to 0 (zero) and I still cannot log to my
> linux
> > >> >>>> server. MOH:AA never had this problem. My setup is similar to
> > >> >>>> everybody. Try if are able to see my server with the in-game
> browser
> > >> >>>> "|NQ|silvex Linux Host" set for search and destroy.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> COD NATed
> > >> >>>> Client eth1 Server eth0
> > >> >>>> 172.16.200.19<-->172.16.200.1<-- COD/Linux -->24.16.199.160
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> I am able to connect to ANYBODY but my server. Will you guys
> address
> > >> >>>> this issue in the 'upcoming' patch. That will be phenomenal!
This
> > >> >>>> game OWNS MOH:AA
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Bryan Kuhn said:
> > >> >>>>> It's a cvar, and it makes the server always authorize.
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >> >>>>> From: Eduardo E. Silva [mailto:esilva at silvex.com]
> > >> >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 12:23 PM
> > >> >>>>> To: cod at icculus.org
> > >> >>>>> Subject: Re: Re[2]: [cod] CoD and my struggle with NAT
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> What does net_lanauthorize do and where is it set ?
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> Bryan Kuhn said:
> > >> >>>>>> Your saying on the same subnet it is still authorizing you?
You
> > >> >>>>>> don't have set to 1 do you? Are you only binding it to the
> > >> >>>>>> external ip address?
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> Wednesday, January 7, 2004, 8:51:02 AM, you wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>> Yep i did but thats my problem, i use my server and firewall
> > >> >>>>>>> tougether.
> > >> >>>>>>> See
> > >> >>>>>>> attached picture of my network. The thing is that my nat
thinks
> > >> >>>>>>> its outside
> > >> >>>>>>> an rotates me directly trough nat.
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> Regards
> > >> >>>>>>> Quint
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> >>>>>>> From: "Steven Hartland" <steven at multiplay.co.uk>
> > >> >>>>>>> To: <cod at icculus.org>
> > >> >>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:40
> > >> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [cod] CoD and my struggle with NAT
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> Did you try this:
> > >> >>>>>>>> <quote>
> > >> >>>>>>>> Had a flash of inspiration this morning I think the
following
> > >> >>>>>>>> might just
> > >> >>>>>>>> work.
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> If we have this picture:
> > >> >>>>>>>> NAT box: internal 10.10.10.1, external 1.1.1.1
> > >> >>>>>>>> Server: internal 10.10.10.2
> > >> >>>>>>>> Client: internal 10.10.10.3
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> If we change this to:
> > >> >>>>>>>> NAT box: internal 10.10.10.1, external 1.1.1.1
> > >> >>>>>>>> Server: internal 10.10.10.2, fake 1.1.1.2 (alias)
> > >> >>>>>>>> Client: internal 10.10.10.3, fake 1.1.1.1 (alias)
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> And then force the client to connect to the server on
1.1.1.2
> the
> > >> >>>>>>>> ip
> > >> >>>>>>> reported
> > >> >>>>>>>> in the packet sent to the master will be the ip of the NAT
> > >> >>>>>>>> (1.1.1.1) and
> > >> >>>>>>> hence
> > >> >>>>>>>> if port forwarding is setup correctly the auth packet will
be
> > >> >>>>>>>> forwarded
> > >> >>>>>>>> to the client on 10.10.10.3 and it will all just work.
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> Adding the 1.1.1.X aliases to the internal machines wont
> affect
> > >> >>>>>>> connectivity
> > >> >>>>>>>> as they have no routes to the outside world so all external
> > >> >>>>>>>> connectivity
> > >> >>>>>>>> will be done via the NAT'ed addresses.
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> I cant test this here as I don't have NAT but Im pretty
> confident
> > >> >>>>>>>> it will
> > >> >>>>>>> work.
> > >> >>>>>>>> </quote>
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> Steve / K
> > >> >>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> >>>>>>>> From: <cod at kaleplek.net>
> > >> >>>>>>>> To: <cod at icculus.org>
> > >> >>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 12:30 PM
> > >> >>>>>>>> Subject: [cod] CoD and my struggle with NAT
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> > Hi all here am back again with more news.... Yes I'm still
> not
> > >> >>>>>>>> stopped
> > >> >>>>>>>> > debugging... ;-)
> > >> >>>>>>>> >
> > >> >>>>>>>> > A little update after asking Actvision for some help and
all
> > >> >>>>>>>> the
> > >> >>>>>>>> good
> > >> >>>>>>>> > ideas here (thanks for that) I went to a couple of friends
> of
> > >> >>>>>>>> mine
> > >> >>>>>>>> who
> > >> >>>>>>> are
> > >> >>>>>>>> > a lot more Linux/Network goeroes then I am and the have
> looked
> > >> >>>>>>>> at
> > >> >>>>>>>> it
> > >> >>>>>>>> and
> > >> >>>>>>>> > came with an answer that was a little bit shocking for me.
> The
> > >> >>>>>>>> answer
> > >> >>>>>>> was
> > >> >>>>>>>> > : IT IS NOT POSSIBLE WITHOUT A LITTLE PROGRAMMING HELP
FROM
> > >> >>>>>>>> ACTIVISION.
> > >> >>>>>>> So
> > >> >>>>>>>> > now I no for sure I am screwed. ;-)
> > >> >>>>>>>> >
> > >> >>>>>>>> > The gave a little push in the following direction.
> Activision
> > >> >>>>>>>> made
> > >> >>>>>>>> a
> > >> >>>>>>>> > mistake to not make the server NAT/Firewall/Multihome
aware
> > >> >>>>>>>> this is
> > >> >>>>>>>> an
> > >> >>>>>>>> > issue that was already on the internet in games like
Diablo
> > >> >>>>>>>> etc.
> > >> >>>>>>>> where
> > >> >>>>>>>> > they fixed it (I really don't know how).
> > >> >>>>>>>> >
> > >> >>>>>>>> > My friends said this method that activision used is a lot
> > >> >>>>>>>> better
> > >> >>>>>>>> then
> > >> >>>>>>> the
> > >> >>>>>>>> > Method of EA because in the actvision method the server
> owner
> > >> >>>>>>>> doesn't
> > >> >>>>>>> get
> > >> >>>>>>>> > the cd-keys in and can't steal them (See a post of me a
> while
> > >> >>>>>>>> back).
> > >> >>>>>>>> But
> > >> >>>>>>>> > this method also brings some problem (DUHHHHH). A fix
would
> be
> > >> >>>>>>>> that
> > >> >>>>>>>> it
> > >> >>>>>>> is
> > >> >>>>>>>> > possible on the server to config it and say if you use a
> > >> >>>>>>>> NAT/Firewall
> > >> >>>>>>> with
> > >> >>>>>>>> > a private address like 10.5.x.x/192.168.x.x etc. etc. to
> give
> > >> >>>>>>>> you
> > >> >>>>>>>> an
> > >> >>>>>>>> > opportunity to give an other address in a config file
> (public
> > >> >>>>>>>> address)
> > >> >>>>>>> the
> > >> >>>>>>>> > will use to auth by activision. This method is like a
proxy
> so
> > >> >>>>>>> activision
> > >> >>>>>>>> > should create a little proxy in there server for nat etc.
> > >> >>>>>>>> >
> > >> >>>>>>>> > We all came to the conclusion when the hype is gone the
came
> > >> >>>>>>>> will
> > >> >>>>>>>> die
> > >> >>>>>>>> > because the private range users who want to play it will
not
> be
> > >> >>>>>>>> able
> > >> >>>>>>>> to
> > >> >>>>>>> do
> > >> >>>>>>>> > so.
> > >> >>>>>>>> >
> > >> >>>>>>>> > So is there a way I can connect to activision or talk to
> > >> >>>>>>>> somebody
> > >> >>>>>>>> who
> > >> >>>>>>>> > build the linux binary version who can help me with this
> > >> >>>>>>>> problem.
> > >> >>>>>>>> Please
> > >> >>>>>>>> > Please help my server is going up in the list and is full
> every
> > >> >>>>>>>> day
> > >> >>>>>>>> now,
> > >> >>>>>>>> > and in this way also I have to stop it because I like to
> host
> > >> >>>>>>>> if I
> > >> >>>>>>>> can
> > >> >>>>>>> be
> > >> >>>>>>>> > a part of it. ;-)
> > >> >>>>>>>> >
> > >> >>>>>>>> > So please who can get me in contact with one of those guys
> or
> > >> >>>>>>>> are
> > >> >>>>>>>> they
> > >> >>>>>>> in
> > >> >>>>>>>> > this mailing group?????
> > >> >>>>>>>> >
> > >> >>>>>>>> > Regards
> > >> >>>>>>>> > Quint
> > >> >>>>>>>> > Boy_One
> > >> >>>>>>>> >
> > >> >>>>>>>> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> ================================================
> > >> >>>>>>>> This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay
(UK)
> > >> >>>>>>>> Ltd. and
> > >> >>>>>>> the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of
> > >> >>>>>>> misdirection,
> > >> >>>>>>> the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or
> > >> >>>>>>> otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in
it.
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete
> > >> >>>>>>>> transmission please
> > >> >>>>>>> telephone (023) 8024 3137
> > >> >>>>>>>> or return the E.mail to postmaster at multiplay.co.uk.
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> --
> > >> >>>>> Thanks,
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> Ed Silva
> > >> >>>>> Silvex Consulting Inc.
> > >> >>>>> esilva at silvex.com
> > >> >>>>> (714) 504-6870 Cell
> > >> >>>>> (714) 897-3800 Fax
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> --
> > >> >>>> Thanks,
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Ed Silva
> > >> >>>> Silvex Consulting Inc.
> > >> >>>> esilva at silvex.com
> > >> >>>> (714) 504-6870 Cell
> > >> >>>> (714) 897-3800 Fax
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
More information about the Cod
mailing list