[cod] CoD and my struggle with NAT
Boy_One (COD System Admin)
cod at kaleplek.net
Sat Jan 10 09:20:24 EST 2004
Almost there...
I did what you say and restarted the server. I got in once and after that no
luck. So i restarted again and yes i got in once and after that no luck... I
get the cd-kay autho again.
Can anybody tell me if the set net_lanauthorize 0 is set back on 1???
Regards
Quint
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bryan Kuhn" <bryan at infinityward.com>
To: <cod at icculus.org>
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 20:01
Subject: Re: [cod] CoD and my struggle with NAT
> Don't use developer. I bet it will work once you turn that off, there
> might be a slight delay when you first connect though.
>
> Friday, January 9, 2004, 10:53:34 AM, you wrote:
> > Here are all my settings i run on my server.
>
> > Startup line : /games/cod/cod_lnxded +set logfile 2 +set developer 2
+set
> > dedicated 2 +set netp_ip 62.216.16.89 +ip 62.216.16.89 +set ttycon 0
+exec
> > quint.cfg
>
> > quint.cfg (i know i like to use my own name... LoL)
>
> > // GENERAL SETTINGS
> > // seta sv_mapRotation "gametype tdm map mp_omaha gametype tdm map
evreux
> > gametype tdm map farm2 gametype tdm map fivepoints gametype tdm map
mp_mink
> > gametype tdm map mp_v2 gametype tdm map Neverland gametype tdm map
> > Portvillage gametype tdm map street gametype dm map DM_Fort gametype tdm
map
> > mp_riveredge gametype tdm map mp_berlin gametype tdm map mp_pegasusday
> > gametype tdm map mp_tanktown gametype tdm map mp_panzerbunker gametype
tdm
> > map farm gametype tdm map mp_brecourt gametype tdm mp_pegasusnight
gametype
> > tdm map mp_carentan gametype tdm map mp_chateau gametype tdm map
> > mp_dawnville gametype tdm map mp_depot gametype tdm map mp_harbor
gametype
> > tdm map mp_hurtgen gametype tdm map mp_pavlov gametype tdm map
mp_powcamp
> > gametype tdm map mp_railyard gametype tdm map mp_rocket gametype tdm map
> > mp_ship "
> > seta sv_mapRotation "gametype tdm map mp_brecourt gametype gametype tdm
map
> > mp_carentan gametype tdm map mp_chateau gametype tdm map mp_dawnville
> > gametype tdm map mp_depot gametype tdm map mp_harbor gametype tdm map
> > mp_hurtgen gametype tdm map mp_pavlov gametype tdm map mp_powcamp
gametype
> > tdm map mp_railyard gametype tdm map mp_rocket gametype tdm map mp_ship
"
> > set sv_hostname "---> Little Fun Dutch Linux Server <---"
> > set scr_motd "Welcome to the dutch Hell Hole!"
> > set rconPassword "xxxxxxxxxx"
> > set g_privatepassword "xxxxxxx"
> > set scr_friendlyfire "0"
> > set sv_cheats "0"
> > seta sv_maxclients "12"
> > set sv_maxping "200"
> > set sv_gamespy 1
> > seta sv_gamespy 1
> > seta dedicated 2
> > set dedicated 2
> > set g_allowvote "0"
> > set scr_allow_vote "0"
> > seta sv_privateclients "2"
> > set sv_allowDownload "0"
>
> > // WEAPONS SETTINGS
> > seta scr_allow_bar "1"
> > seta scr_allow_mp40 "1"
> > seta scr_allow_mp44 "1"
> > seta scr_allow_ppsh "1"
> > seta scr_allow_sten "1"
> > seta scr_allow_thompson "1"
> > seta scr_allow_bren "1"
> > seta scr_allow_m1garand "1"
> > seta scr_allow_nagant "1"
> > seta scr_allow_enfield "1"
> > seta scr_allow_kar98k "1"
> > seta scr_allow_m1carbine "1"
> > seta scr_allow_kar98ksniper "1"
> > seta scr_allow_springfield "1"
> > seta scr_allow_fg42 "0"
> > seta scr_allow_panzerfaust "1"
>
> > //pk3 settings and messages en wat prive dingen
>
> > //Kill cam-spectate mod + how-to
>
> > set g_ioteamspec 1 // 1 = Teamonly
spectate 0
> > = spectate all
> > set g_ioteamspec "1" // 1 = Teamonly
spectate 0
> > = spectate all
> > set g_iokillcam 1 // 1 = killcam on 0 =
> > killcam off
> > set g_iokillcam "1" // 1 = killcam on 0 =
> > killcam off
>
> > seta sv_linerd1 "Welcome to ---> Little Fun Dutch Linux Server <---"
> > seta sv_linerd2 "Server Admin Boy_One and Padjepuf"
> > seta sv_linerd3 "Home of -> SE Easy CLAN <-"
> > seta sv_linerd4 "For any questions please contact us at: Server Admin
email:
> > cod at kaleplek.net"
> > seta sv_rddelay "10"
>
> > seta sv_master1 "codmaster.activision.com"
> > seta sv_master2 "master0.gamespy.com"
> > seta sv_master3 "master1.gamespy.com"
> > seta sv_master4 "clanservers.net
> > // set net_lanauthorize 0
>
> > // ADVANCED SETTINGS
> > seta net_port "28960"
> > seta scr_forcerespawn "0"
> > seta sv_floodprotect "1"
> > seta developer "2"
> > seta pure "1"
> > seta g_log "qconsole.log"
> > seta scr_drawfriend "0"
> > seta sv_fps "20"
> > set sv_maxrate "2100"
>
> > // GAMETYPE - SPECIFIC SETTINGS
> > seta scr_dm_scorelimit "50"
> > seta scr_dm_timelimit "30"
> > seta scr_tdm_scorelimit "250"
> > seta scr_tdm_timelimit "20"
> > seta scr_sd_scorelimit "10"
> > seta scr_sd_timelimit "0"
> > seta scr_sd_graceperiod "15"
> > seta scr_sd_roundlength "4"
> > seta scr_sd_roundlimit "0"
> > seta scr_bel_alivepointtime "10"
> > seta scr_bel_timelimit "30"
> > seta scr_bel_scorelimit "50"
> > seta scr_re_showcarrier "0"
> > seta scr_re_scorelimit "0"
> > seta scr_re_timelimit "0"
> > seta scr_re_graceperiod "15"
> > seta scr_re_roundlength "4"
> > seta scr_re_roundlimit "0"
>
> > // CUSTOM ENTRY
>
> > seta scr_motd "Welcome to the dutch Hell Hole!"
> > // Please leave the above line in or somehow acknowledge you have used
this
> > program, thanks.
>
> > // START MAP CYCLE
> > map_rotate
>
>
> > Regards
> > Quint
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bryan Kuhn" <bryan at infinityward.com>
> > To: <cod at icculus.org>
> > Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 19:09
> > Subject: Re: [cod] CoD and my struggle with NAT
>
>
> >> Are you running developer 1? I have a hard time getting it to happen
> >> with developer off.
> >>
> >> Friday, January 9, 2004, 4:08:57 AM, you wrote:
> >> > Yeah..... That's exactly my problem a multihomed network for public
use,
> >> > and no connection from private network... Thanks for looking at
this...
> >> > I hope it's going to be fixed. If you need a testserver/testclient or
> > what
> >> > else... Here i am......
> >>
> >> >> Its only multihomed servers with public and private interfaces. It
even
> >> >> works correctly over a vpn with 2 different private networks. This
> > isn't
> >> >> that common except for people running small private servers
> >> >> which could just be run as dedicated 1.
> >> >>
> >> >> Friday, January 9, 2004, 12:59:14 AM, you wrote:
> >> >>> Bryan,
> >> >>
> >> >>> we have been posting this issue for a long time. It would be really
> >> >>> great if it got addressed. I am really surprised that this was
never
> >> >>> tested. Very few companies used public IP address for internal
LANs.
> >> >>> All of them use non-public addresses (i.e. 192.168.0.0).
> >> >>
> >> >>> I also think this applies to the Windows version.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>> Bryan Kuhn said:
> >> >>>> I think I finally reproed this. No promises it gets fixed or
anything
> >> >>>> though.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >> >>>> From: Eduardo E. Silva [mailto:esilva at silvex.com]
> >> >>>> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:01 PM
> >> >>>> To: cod at icculus.org
> >> >>>> Subject: RE: Re[2]: [cod] CoD and my struggle with NAT
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Bryan, I have mine set to 0 (zero) and I still cannot log to my
linux
> >> >>>> server. MOH:AA never had this problem. My setup is similar to
> >> >>>> everybody. Try if are able to see my server with the in-game
browser
> >> >>>> "|NQ|silvex Linux Host" set for search and destroy.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> COD NATed
> >> >>>> Client eth1 Server eth0
> >> >>>> 172.16.200.19<-->172.16.200.1<-- COD/Linux -->24.16.199.160
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I am able to connect to ANYBODY but my server. Will you guys
address
> >> >>>> this issue in the 'upcoming' patch. That will be phenomenal! This
> >> >>>> game OWNS MOH:AA
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Bryan Kuhn said:
> >> >>>>> It's a cvar, and it makes the server always authorize.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >> >>>>> From: Eduardo E. Silva [mailto:esilva at silvex.com]
> >> >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 12:23 PM
> >> >>>>> To: cod at icculus.org
> >> >>>>> Subject: Re: Re[2]: [cod] CoD and my struggle with NAT
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> What does net_lanauthorize do and where is it set ?
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Bryan Kuhn said:
> >> >>>>>> Your saying on the same subnet it is still authorizing you? You
> >> >>>>>> don't have set to 1 do you? Are you only binding it to the
> >> >>>>>> external ip address?
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Wednesday, January 7, 2004, 8:51:02 AM, you wrote:
> >> >>>>>>> Yep i did but thats my problem, i use my server and firewall
> >> >>>>>>> tougether.
> >> >>>>>>> See
> >> >>>>>>> attached picture of my network. The thing is that my nat thinks
> >> >>>>>>> its outside
> >> >>>>>>> an rotates me directly trough nat.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Regards
> >> >>>>>>> Quint
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >> >>>>>>> From: "Steven Hartland" <steven at multiplay.co.uk>
> >> >>>>>>> To: <cod at icculus.org>
> >> >>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:40
> >> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [cod] CoD and my struggle with NAT
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Did you try this:
> >> >>>>>>>> <quote>
> >> >>>>>>>> Had a flash of inspiration this morning I think the following
> >> >>>>>>>> might just
> >> >>>>>>>> work.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> If we have this picture:
> >> >>>>>>>> NAT box: internal 10.10.10.1, external 1.1.1.1
> >> >>>>>>>> Server: internal 10.10.10.2
> >> >>>>>>>> Client: internal 10.10.10.3
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> If we change this to:
> >> >>>>>>>> NAT box: internal 10.10.10.1, external 1.1.1.1
> >> >>>>>>>> Server: internal 10.10.10.2, fake 1.1.1.2 (alias)
> >> >>>>>>>> Client: internal 10.10.10.3, fake 1.1.1.1 (alias)
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> And then force the client to connect to the server on 1.1.1.2
the
> >> >>>>>>>> ip
> >> >>>>>>> reported
> >> >>>>>>>> in the packet sent to the master will be the ip of the NAT
> >> >>>>>>>> (1.1.1.1) and
> >> >>>>>>> hence
> >> >>>>>>>> if port forwarding is setup correctly the auth packet will be
> >> >>>>>>>> forwarded
> >> >>>>>>>> to the client on 10.10.10.3 and it will all just work.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Adding the 1.1.1.X aliases to the internal machines wont
affect
> >> >>>>>>> connectivity
> >> >>>>>>>> as they have no routes to the outside world so all external
> >> >>>>>>>> connectivity
> >> >>>>>>>> will be done via the NAT'ed addresses.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> I cant test this here as I don't have NAT but Im pretty
confident
> >> >>>>>>>> it will
> >> >>>>>>> work.
> >> >>>>>>>> </quote>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Steve / K
> >> >>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >> >>>>>>>> From: <cod at kaleplek.net>
> >> >>>>>>>> To: <cod at icculus.org>
> >> >>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 12:30 PM
> >> >>>>>>>> Subject: [cod] CoD and my struggle with NAT
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> > Hi all here am back again with more news.... Yes I'm still
not
> >> >>>>>>>> stopped
> >> >>>>>>>> > debugging... ;-)
> >> >>>>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>>>> > A little update after asking Actvision for some help and all
> >> >>>>>>>> the
> >> >>>>>>>> good
> >> >>>>>>>> > ideas here (thanks for that) I went to a couple of friends
of
> >> >>>>>>>> mine
> >> >>>>>>>> who
> >> >>>>>>> are
> >> >>>>>>>> > a lot more Linux/Network goeroes then I am and the have
looked
> >> >>>>>>>> at
> >> >>>>>>>> it
> >> >>>>>>>> and
> >> >>>>>>>> > came with an answer that was a little bit shocking for me.
The
> >> >>>>>>>> answer
> >> >>>>>>> was
> >> >>>>>>>> > : IT IS NOT POSSIBLE WITHOUT A LITTLE PROGRAMMING HELP FROM
> >> >>>>>>>> ACTIVISION.
> >> >>>>>>> So
> >> >>>>>>>> > now I no for sure I am screwed. ;-)
> >> >>>>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>>>> > The gave a little push in the following direction.
Activision
> >> >>>>>>>> made
> >> >>>>>>>> a
> >> >>>>>>>> > mistake to not make the server NAT/Firewall/Multihome aware
> >> >>>>>>>> this is
> >> >>>>>>>> an
> >> >>>>>>>> > issue that was already on the internet in games like Diablo
> >> >>>>>>>> etc.
> >> >>>>>>>> where
> >> >>>>>>>> > they fixed it (I really don't know how).
> >> >>>>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>>>> > My friends said this method that activision used is a lot
> >> >>>>>>>> better
> >> >>>>>>>> then
> >> >>>>>>> the
> >> >>>>>>>> > Method of EA because in the actvision method the server
owner
> >> >>>>>>>> doesn't
> >> >>>>>>> get
> >> >>>>>>>> > the cd-keys in and can't steal them (See a post of me a
while
> >> >>>>>>>> back).
> >> >>>>>>>> But
> >> >>>>>>>> > this method also brings some problem (DUHHHHH). A fix would
be
> >> >>>>>>>> that
> >> >>>>>>>> it
> >> >>>>>>> is
> >> >>>>>>>> > possible on the server to config it and say if you use a
> >> >>>>>>>> NAT/Firewall
> >> >>>>>>> with
> >> >>>>>>>> > a private address like 10.5.x.x/192.168.x.x etc. etc. to
give
> >> >>>>>>>> you
> >> >>>>>>>> an
> >> >>>>>>>> > opportunity to give an other address in a config file
(public
> >> >>>>>>>> address)
> >> >>>>>>> the
> >> >>>>>>>> > will use to auth by activision. This method is like a proxy
so
> >> >>>>>>> activision
> >> >>>>>>>> > should create a little proxy in there server for nat etc.
> >> >>>>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>>>> > We all came to the conclusion when the hype is gone the came
> >> >>>>>>>> will
> >> >>>>>>>> die
> >> >>>>>>>> > because the private range users who want to play it will not
be
> >> >>>>>>>> able
> >> >>>>>>>> to
> >> >>>>>>> do
> >> >>>>>>>> > so.
> >> >>>>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>>>> > So is there a way I can connect to activision or talk to
> >> >>>>>>>> somebody
> >> >>>>>>>> who
> >> >>>>>>>> > build the linux binary version who can help me with this
> >> >>>>>>>> problem.
> >> >>>>>>>> Please
> >> >>>>>>>> > Please help my server is going up in the list and is full
every
> >> >>>>>>>> day
> >> >>>>>>>> now,
> >> >>>>>>>> > and in this way also I have to stop it because I like to
host
> >> >>>>>>>> if I
> >> >>>>>>>> can
> >> >>>>>>> be
> >> >>>>>>>> > a part of it. ;-)
> >> >>>>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>>>> > So please who can get me in contact with one of those guys
or
> >> >>>>>>>> are
> >> >>>>>>>> they
> >> >>>>>>> in
> >> >>>>>>>> > this mailing group?????
> >> >>>>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>>>> > Regards
> >> >>>>>>>> > Quint
> >> >>>>>>>> > Boy_One
> >> >>>>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> ================================================
> >> >>>>>>>> This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK)
> >> >>>>>>>> Ltd. and
> >> >>>>>>> the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of
> >> >>>>>>> misdirection,
> >> >>>>>>> the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or
> >> >>>>>>> otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete
> >> >>>>>>>> transmission please
> >> >>>>>>> telephone (023) 8024 3137
> >> >>>>>>>> or return the E.mail to postmaster at multiplay.co.uk.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> --
> >> >>>>> Thanks,
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Ed Silva
> >> >>>>> Silvex Consulting Inc.
> >> >>>>> esilva at silvex.com
> >> >>>>> (714) 504-6870 Cell
> >> >>>>> (714) 897-3800 Fax
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> --
> >> >>>> Thanks,
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Ed Silva
> >> >>>> Silvex Consulting Inc.
> >> >>>> esilva at silvex.com
> >> >>>> (714) 504-6870 Cell
> >> >>>> (714) 897-3800 Fax
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
>
More information about the Cod
mailing list