[bf1942] Memory Leak Update

Mark J. DeFilippis defilm at acm.org
Fri Jul 8 18:57:16 EDT 2005

Uh no.  A pit in my stomach...

What if the only reason EA moved on this is because it is impacting
the Ranked server revenue stream.  There is nothing that says they will
call in the team to fix the ranked server code, and immediately fix the
unranked server code tree as well!

It is kind of to their advantage to not do so.

So we still don't know if it is tonight, or next week. :-(


At 12:47 PM 7/8/2005, you wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jon Wolberg" <jon at defenderhosting.com>
>To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
>Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 12:25 PM
>Subject: Re: [bf1942] Memory Leak Update
> > Direct from EA of course.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "David Stevens" <dave at netdefense.ca>
> > To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
> > Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 12:15 PM
> > Subject: RE: [bf1942] Memory Leak Update
> >
> >
> > > Where did you get this info?
> > >
> > >
>So let's get this straight.  All of us corresponding with each other on this
>list, the one EA told us to use, are not worth a simple post from someone at
>EA telling us what's going on?  This is extremely disappointing to say the
>Is it correct to assume that you are a ranked server provider, Jon?  If so,
>perhaps you could shed some light on how EA/Dice is communicating to those
>who are in their inner circle.  Inquiring minds want to know.  ;)

Mark J. DeFilippis, Ph. D EE          defilm at acm.org
                                       defilm at ieee.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/bf1942/attachments/20050708/499cec76/attachment.htm>

More information about the Bf1942 mailing list