[bf1942] Has EA sanctioned use of BF2CC daemon on ranked servers?

[kama]

Thats because of the stupidity to use .NET framework on the serverside...
They would probably have less problems if they used C or C++.

And from my understanding, the choice of .NET was due to pure laziness
from the BF2CC coders.

/Bjorn

On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Tim Cooper wrote:

> Or their running linux and mono eats up 70% cpu :P
>
> "Don't dip in the mustard if you can't ketchup"
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Wolberg [mailto:jon at defenderhosting.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 8:52 PM
> To: bf1942 at icculus.org
> Subject: Re: [bf1942] Has EA sanctioned use of BF2CC daemon on ranked
> servers?
>
> Yes they have.  We are using it on all of our customers' servers here.
>
> Most likely your provider does not want to spend the time to deploy the
> daemon as it cuts into his profits ( work time ) to do so.
>
> Jon
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "ScratchMonkey" <ScratchMonkey at MatureAsskickers.net>
> To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 9:37 PM
> Subject: [bf1942] Has EA sanctioned use of BF2CC daemon on ranked servers?
>
>
> > Subject says it all. My team's ranked server at Branzone is currently
> > supplying the rcon interface but it would be nice to have the daemon for
> > the extra features, like independent admin logins for each team member.
> > According to my teammate who pays for the server, Brandon at Branzone says
>
> > EA told him the daemon isn't allowed on ranked servers, but this is at
> > odds with what I'm hearing in the BF2CC forums. Can some insider pass this
>
> > question on to the ranked list?
> >
> > The daemon is working fine on our unranked server, which so far we've only
>
> > seen traffic on for matches.
> >
>
>
>
>