[bf1942] Anyone have a popular non-ranked server?

Jon Wolberg jon at defenderhosting.com
Tue Aug 16 10:21:08 EDT 2005

16 slot?  Try 64 slot.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rayne" <rayne at bf2-maps.com>
To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:17 AM
Subject: RE: [bf1942] Anyone have a popular non-ranked server?

> [rant]
> Are you blind or just drunk? To become a "trusted provider" you have to 
> fire
> up 10 16-slot servers for the gaming community. Then for every 10 servers
> you sell you have to fire up another one. ALL to the benefit of EA's 
> ranked
> server system. Personally, I think that having individual stats in a
> team-based game is completely destructive to the environment of the game.
> We've got snipers sitting outside of spawn, chopper pilots hovering over
> spawns and nobody is trying to take a flag to win the map. You call that
> good gameplay? How about the beautiful little mod that DC had that would
> kill you if you entered the opponent's main base for more than 5-10 
> seconds?
> How about make the ranked servers have their own little world and let the
> modding communities and custom maps be run ONLY on unranked servers where
> players want to WIN and not just pad their "ranked" scores.
> [/rant]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ScratchMonkey [mailto:ScratchMonkey at MatureAsskickers.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:10 AM
> To: bf1942 at icculus.org
> Subject: Re: [bf1942] Anyone have a popular non-ranked server?
> --On Tuesday, August 16, 2005 9:42 AM -0400 Dave Snodgrass
> <packtloss at gmail.com> wrote:
>> They didnt invest all this time/effort into mods and stats, if they dont
>> plan to profit from them.
> Wait a minute. Didn't somebody say EA doesn't profit from the ranked 
> server
> program?

More information about the Bf1942 mailing list