[bf1942] Anyone have a popular non-ranked server?

Rayne rayne at bf2-maps.com
Tue Aug 16 10:17:22 EDT 2005


Are you blind or just drunk? To become a "trusted provider" you have to fire
up 10 16-slot servers for the gaming community. Then for every 10 servers
you sell you have to fire up another one. ALL to the benefit of EA's ranked
server system. Personally, I think that having individual stats in a
team-based game is completely destructive to the environment of the game.
We've got snipers sitting outside of spawn, chopper pilots hovering over
spawns and nobody is trying to take a flag to win the map. You call that
good gameplay? How about the beautiful little mod that DC had that would
kill you if you entered the opponent's main base for more than 5-10 seconds?
How about make the ranked servers have their own little world and let the
modding communities and custom maps be run ONLY on unranked servers where
players want to WIN and not just pad their "ranked" scores.


-----Original Message-----
From: ScratchMonkey [mailto:ScratchMonkey at MatureAsskickers.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:10 AM
To: bf1942 at icculus.org
Subject: Re: [bf1942] Anyone have a popular non-ranked server?

--On Tuesday, August 16, 2005 9:42 AM -0400 Dave Snodgrass 
<packtloss at gmail.com> wrote:

> They didnt invest all this time/effort into mods and stats, if they dont
> plan to profit from them.

Wait a minute. Didn't somebody say EA doesn't profit from the ranked server 

More information about the Bf1942 mailing list