AW: [bf1942] BF Viet and BFSMD

Jon Wolberg jon at ecgnetwork.com
Sat Mar 13 12:31:08 EST 2004


Ditto on this.  I would prefer to use BFSM for our customers as well, but
i'd just hate to have to revert back to the complicated process required to
change settings without it.

Jon Wolberg
Tech Support Manager
www.ECGNetwork.Com
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Christopher Kunz" <chrislist at de-punkt.de>
To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: AW: [bf1942] BF Viet and BFSMD


> Martin Steiger wrote:
>
> > Conclusion: Don't understand me wrong: BFSMD is and will always be my
> > favourite admin-application. But if DICE decides, not to go with it and
> > Kevin doesn't want to invest more (spare)time in it: Why "bitching"
around?
> > That's the way life goes... ;)
>
> Actually, that's my sentiment too. If there is going to be a BF:V
> compatible version of BFSMD around, great. Great for our customers, but
> I actually don't depend on this. Neither do our customers, since they
> have all they need (FTP access, remote console, web interface) to
> administrate their servers without BFSMD.
>
> --ck




More information about the Bf1942 mailing list