[bf1942] Peter: What about GLIBC <= 2.2?

Kingsley Foreman kingsley at internode.com.au
Fri Mar 12 08:42:34 EST 2004

RE: [bf1942] Peter: What about GLIBC <= 2.2?it might be drunk but that made no sense to me :)


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Peter Chang 
  To: 'bf1942 at icculus.org' 
  Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 11:04 PM
  Subject: RE: [bf1942] Peter: What about GLIBC <= 2.2?

  From: Kingsley Foreman [mailto:kingsley at internode.com.au]
  Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 10:55 PM
  To: bf1942 at icculus.org
  Subject: Re: [bf1942] Peter: What about GLIBC <= 2.2?

     - server may have a default (system dependent ip), but if the user 
          wants to bind to a specific one, please do it. 
          (thanks to kingsley foreman) 

    still not working
    still isn't binding ASE or gamespy to the ip address (ase not responding and gamespy still not showing up when ip is assigned)

  hmmm... that works for me right now. wait.... hmm.... it seems that the gameserver and setup have different ideas about the ip address. <sigh> it is only a *foolish* consistency that is the hobgoblin of little minds. sorry about that
    remote console is working now, but as you said serverstatus stops when connected

  yeah, but it doesn't hang when you enable it :-)

  actually it was only when i went home last night that the actual message handling logic for the remote console is nightmare so something is looping when it shouldn't. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/bf1942/attachments/20040313/9468aa1e/attachment.htm>

More information about the Bf1942 mailing list