Duke3D: Still need to get Bargle's console and such into the icculus.org CVS, but everyone is stretched too thin to do so at the moment. We'll get it there soon. Not counting the Mac port, we're really just about done with everything we wanted to do with Duke3D. Devastation: Server is out. Details here. Beta 1 of the Linux client is avaiable. Get it. Serious Sam: The First Encounter: Beta three is out. The Second Encounter is now available, too! Details are here. Time to work on ssam is non-existant, and there will probably not be another build for Linux for the foreseeable future, if ever. Unreal Tournament 2003: The Mac demo is out! Go find a mirror. It's about 135 megs. Reviews on the various forums are good...and to my surprise, people are reporting acceptable performance on machines I would have considered vastly underpowered! There's one guy swearing he's getting 20 fps on a 400MHz machine. If you are hesistating because you are under the minimum specs but have some bandwidth to spare, it might be worth checking it out just in case. Some other Mac stuff...there's some misinformation and unanswered questions floating around I need to address: MAKE SURE YOU'VE GOT OSX 10.2.6! Here's a brief breakdown on your results on earlier MacOS versions (from memory, this hasn't been tested recently) : 10.0 and 10.1: Probably won't even start up. Anything before 10.2.3: No S3TC support...textures lose quality, we have to cut a miplevel to allow for higher video memory usage since we need to decompress the textures manually. Lots of graphical issues, probably crappy performance. 10.2.3: Game will have rendering bugs and shitty performance on all video cards. Run Software Update! 10.2.4: Game will run _extremely_ poorly on most ATI cards on this version... there were about a million ATI-specific fixes for ut2003 in 10.2.5 (thanks to Chris Bentley, Phil Churchil, Thomas Fortier, and many others who did everything from optimize the hell out of the drivers to add an OpenGL extension to increase performance to fix a win32 bug of all things). ATI engineers never get enough credit in this day and age, but ATI's Mac engineers are first rate as far as I'm concerned. 10.2.5: Game will have rendering flaws and random crashes on GF2mx and GF4mx cards (Thanks to Geoff Stahl and John Stauffer for smashing this for a speedy 10.2.6 patch). 10.2.6: All known OpenGL bugs and performance issues at the OS level are fixed. If you haven't gotten the hint yet: UPGRADE TO THIS VERSION NOW! The OSX demo is network compatible with the latest win32 and linux demos. The OSX demo has GameRanger support (thanks to Scott Kevill for staying up until ungodly hours to help with this). The demo UI won't let you specify various resolutions that fit (say) a 23" Cinema Display well. This is because the list of available resolutions are hardcoded in UnrealScript and changing this breaks network compatibility with Linux and Windows players. I snuck all the popular Mac screen resolutions (like 1680x1050 and 1920x1200) in before the latest win32 patch, so the retail Mac version will have these out of the box. The brave among you can get the demo to use these resolutions by editing a config file; otherwise, you can use the in-game UI for the price of the game. :) There are Altivec optimizations if you've got a G4 CPU, but this isn't required (game runs on G3s for you poor bastards that are in iBook land). The game does use dual CPUs...the music is decoded in a separate thread which MacOS X will toss on the second processor on dual systems. Some implementations of OpenAL will do their mixing on the second processor, too. On Linux, this is easily a 5-10 fps boost for SMP boxes, and I wouldn't be surprised to see similar results on the Mac...but I haven't explicitly benchmarked this. Most games are generally single-threaded, but understand that this means a Dual box will still be able to cook one CPU for the game itself and run the other 20 or so system processes on the other processor, so there's still a benefit to this. We'll be listening to what people say to MacSoft (and I'll be trolling various web forums)...we'll all be taking the responses seriously before finalizing a gold master. The timeframe is short...my personal goal is to bless a gold master sometime after returning from E3, but that is not a solid date commitment, before you go and post my .plan file on Inside Mac Games. We'll go with the standard Epic response of "two weeks". We all know what that really means. :) Don't email me bug reports; I am drowning in the workload from hell for shiny things I'll be showing at E3. Email bug reports to James at MacSoft: firstname.lastname@example.org ... he'll organize them and filter them to me. This is the best way to get your bug report noticed! If you post a bug report on forum, even a popular one, I can't guarantee the right people (like me) will see it. While I'm talking about "don't email me"...don't email me to ask if a given game is being ported to MacOS or Linux or your toaster. Those are my guidelines. If you just want to chat, feel free to drop me a line. :) Thank you for your patience...I know this took forever to get out the door, but I hope we used the time to get it right. The good news is all of my engine changes will be eventually be made available to all Unreal Engine licensees, so hopefully this will result in more Mac ports...and more ports on a faster timetable than UT2003 was done. MOHAA: There will be another Linux dedicated server patch (that's compatible with Spearhead 2.15), but...I'm fucking swamped. I'll let you know when it's here. America's Army: (Please, no more beta testing applications. Thanks!) Beta testing continues. Other stuff: I love the Apple Music Store. I am in love with the Apple Music Store. I've been bitching for so long about how Napster demonstrated a few things (in my mind at least): 1) People want downloadable music. 2) People don't want DRM-encumbered media. 3) People don't want to pay 18 bucks for a CD. 4) People sometimes just want one or two tracks from a given disc. 5) People want to search for what they are in the mood for. THANK GOD Apple managed to move a million tracks the first week. If this thing blew up in their faces, all those pricks that labelled Napster a pirate's haven would be justified. ...well, okay, it WAS a pirate's haven. But music warezing aside, it shows that the current system blows and the consumer wants more for their money. Now we've got proof that people will pay for online music on their terms, and will move a ton of inventory. So I get a Music Store account, dig around. The selection could improve, but for what is pretty obviously meant to be an experiment, it isn't bad. Of course the real big Top 40 names are there, Eminem on the front page, etc. A search for "Red Hot Chili Peppers" turned up zero hits, yet there's an album by Rammstein up there, so the selection is pretty varied and not necessarily what you expect. Hit the "buy album" button for Sheryl Crow's debut disc, and it asks me four times if I really want to do this, reminding me that this is going to charge my card, and verifying my account password...you can disable all these confirmations, but I refused to let it save my my password, for protection against my own impulse buying more than anything. It charges me ten bucks for the complete album in AAC (some MPEG-4 thing) format. It downloads faster than I could burn it to disc using the Starbucks WiFi network, and puts it in a "purchased music" folder in iTunes. Sound quality is good, but my hearing sucks, so it's hard to say, really. When I got home, I popped a blank CD into my Powerbook and hit the atomic-looking "burn" button in iTunes, and came up with an audio CD a few minutes later. My curiousity kicked in, so I popped the disc into another computer...the CDDB query actually correctly identified the album...that was really the deal-maker for me, honestly, dunno why. Apple's terms of usage allow you to burn the disc, use it on up to three computers at once, and convert it to MP3, etc...basically, there's no significant legal restrictions on this that you wouldn't get from a physical disc bought in a store. If there's only two tracks on a disc you want (cough cough Norah Jones cough), you can buy them at 99 cents a piece. I recall reading that you can print out album art from the site, too, but that's not really interesting to me. So what I want now: 1) Indie artists. I really hope Apple didn't sign away their right to do this when dealing with Universal. Ideally there'll be an indie section with a public moderation system that can allow really good unknowns with no marketing to float to the top by virtual word of mouth. Let people that have bought moderated tracks weigh in more heavily with their vote...this both gives more weight to their word if they've actually HEARD an individual track and it gives people incentive to buy through Apple. I would love to see talented people make it big in the way people think "making it big" works before they get their first assraping from a publisher. This could be what MP3.com wanted to be now that the technology is in place. 2) Bigger selection, more labels. I want to see Faith No More on there, I want to find my searches for no-brainer titles and bands not come up empty. I want more complete discographies and less "Partial Albums". I want to see the Righteous Babe Records catalog online here. At any rate, I'm predicting my ass will be buying more albums over a wireless network at the airport while waiting for my flight to E3. One of Apple's devrel people told me the Music Store was "Digital Crack" and I totally believe it...but the bottom line is Apple totally nailed it on the first try and I'm happy to have them as my Digital Pusher. --ryan.