[quake3] Hoorj!

[Ludwig Nussel]

Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
> (btw, "inline" is valid in C++ and the C99 spec for regular C. __inline
> is not valid C in any spec...the underscores sort of unofficially alert
> you that it's an extension, even though gcc and VS.NET both support it.
> If you find a compiler that doesn't, a simple:
> 
> #define __inline
> 
> Will make that code compile with more or less the same results.)

There already is a macro ID_INLINE in q_shared.h. It expands to
__inline for VC, static for lcc and inline for gcc.

cu
Ludwig

-- 
 (o_   Ludwig Nussel
 //\   SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Development
 V_/_  http://www.suse.de/