[quake3] Re: removing jpeglib from svn

[Jamie Wilkinson]

This one time, at band camp, Tim Angus wrote:
>On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:25:30 +1000 Jamie wrote:
>> >The non-bytecode support in q3lcc is completely unnecessary and
>> >unused, whereas jpeg support is fundamentally necessary and used
>> >throughout. Messing with the unused portions of q3lcc is not at all
>> >analogous to changing the jpeg code.
>> 
>> You misread me.
>
>...or you don't make your point clearly enough. ;)

More probable: I hadn't had any coffee :)

>libjpeg is not like either of these examples since it is not platform
>specific and Q3 needs it all the time. Delegation of maintenance is not
>a big enough pro to outweigh the cons, especially since what is there
>works fine and thus doesn't need any maintenance.

Ok.