[openbox] [RELEASE] Openbox 3.3.990 (3.4 preview release)

Dana Jansens danakj at orodu.net
Tue May 22 18:28:17 EDT 2007

On 5/22/07, Keith W <n4phth4 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/21/07, Lucas Hazel <lucas at die.net.au> wrote:
> [snip]
> > I didn't notice that one (as I tend not to minimise windows), but you're
> > right. I suspect it's another conflict with libwnck as minimised
> > windows can be restored from the pinboard.
> >
> > Very strange how it's only affecting GTK apps...
> >
> > --
> > Lucas Hazel <lucas at die.net.au>
> Very strange indeed.  But I've made progress, though it still makes
> zero sense to me. :)
> I copied the rc.xml to my ~/.config/openbox/ and started changing
> suspicious options one by one.  (Dana, FYI it looks like there's a
> stray closing comment marker just before the end of the stock rc.xml
> in 3.3.991).  The culprit is the AnimateIconify option.  When set to
> yes (the default) we get this weird-ass libwnck/pager/taskbar
> behavior.  When set to no, the pager/taskbar behave as they should.
> weird?  Yes.

Have you tried the 3.3.991 release? I'm not seeing anything weird with
gnome-panel's pager at least, but I remember there was some weirdness
at one point recently that was fixed. I'm not sure if that pager uses
libwnck but I think it does. Rox pager is a rather pain to get to work
apparently unless you use zeroconf :/


More information about the openbox mailing list