[openbox] Images in the menu

[GI]

On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 07:33:34PM +0200, Mark Gj?l wrote:

> GI wrote:
> 
> >I was however wondering about the following: Someone mentioned that
> >IceWM takes less memory than OpenBox. If true, that's really strange.
> >OpenBox is pretty minimal, and it's hard to imagine anything this
> >*usable* bieng smaller!
> 
> My test (though probably na?ve) was made on my university computers with 
> top. Here's the output:
> 
> Openbox:
> PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE  SIZE   RES STATE    TIME    CPU COMMAND
> 5130 s011269    1  59    0   10M 9064K sleep    1:31  0.00% openbox
> 
> IceWM:
> PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE  SIZE   RES STATE    TIME    CPU COMMAND
> 122 s021781    1  59    0 4664K 4024K sleep    0:06  0.00% icewm
> 
> It should be noted, though, that on my home computer openbox is about 
> 5MB, not 9...

Hmm. On my computer I get:

    ~>ps -FC openbox
    UID        PID  PPID  C    SZ  RSS PSR STIME TTY          TIME CMD
    gautam    3170  3156  0  2051 4176   0 Oct28 tty2     00:00:53 openbox

and 

    ~>ps v -C openbox
    PID TTY      STAT   TIME  MAJFL   TRS   DRS  RSS %MEM COMMAND
    3170 tty2     S      0:53    117   180  8023 4176  1.6 openbox

I guess the 4176 is kbytes right?

GI

-- 
'Indifference' -- Attitude adopted by a woman towards a man in whom she 
has no interest; interpreted by the man as "playing hard to get".