[Gtkradiant] Bundled libraries

[Christopher]

I may have misunderstood what you are trying to do then. I don't know
the source code well so I can only guess how it currently does things.
I'd appreciate someone that knows it better than me to chime in.

On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 6:51 PM, bebo_sudo <bebo.sudo at gmail.com> wrote:
> Il 01/04/2013 22:32, Christopher ha scritto:
>
>> If you're not a programmer you're going to have a hard time making
>> Radiant comply with having to have packages externally. Radiant
>> requires the libraries it uses to perform functions, e.g. the image
>> libraries to load textures. Removing the code would mean Radiant
>> couldn't show textures at all.
>>
>> What you would have to do is basically leave the code as-is, change
>> the compiling script to not statically-link the libraries, then write
>> some code to load the libraries when it loads. I haven't looked at the
>> code base in ages and I haven't used dynamically loaded libraries yet
>> in any of my own code so I don't know the specifics on making that
>> work.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:58 PM, bebo_sudo<bebo.sudo at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Il 01/04/2013 18:46, Christopher ha scritto:
>>>
>>>> Why not dynamically load the library instead of stripping the
>>>> functions they provide?
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 12:12 PM, bebo_sudo<bebo.sudo at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>> in my attempt to do the, by now famous, rpm for fedora, I bumped into
>>>>> the
>>>>> embedded libraries, libpng and libjpeg.
>>>>> The fedoraproject doesn't allow built-in libraries in rpm, so I have to
>>>>> remove them, as said here by Hans de Goede:
>>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836840#c15
>>>>>
>>>>> The needed libraries will be required by the rpmbuild itself at the
>>>>> moment
>>>>> of the install.
>>>>> Now my question is: how to patch the sources to remove any sort of
>>>>> these
>>>>> libs?
>>>>>
>>>>> I tried to remove the most part of files in which I encountered the
>>>>> "png"
>>>>> or
>>>>> "jpeg" words but I think I made some errors.
>>>>> Here I uploaded my attempt of a patch:http://pastebin.com/iG4nDEWf
>>>>> and here the exit status when I try to build the rpm:
>>>>> http://pastebin.com/FY3f2rEA
>>>>>
>>>>> How can I avoid scons to build these libraries?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>> bebo
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Gtkradiant mailing list
>>>>> Gtkradiant at icculus.org
>>>>> http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkradiant
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gtkradiant mailing list
>>>> Gtkradiant at icculus.org
>>>> http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkradiant
>>>
>>> Thank's for your reply.
>>>
>>> I have to tell I'm not a programmer and I don't know exactly what
>>> "dinamically load" means.
>>> I think the fedoraproject want packages done in this way because if every
>>> package would bundle in itself its libs, the fedora repositories would be
>>> very heavy.
>>>
>>> Are there differences between the embedded version and the version i take
>>> from the fedora repos? didn't have the same functions?
>>>
>>> If you want to contribute to packaging gtkradiant for fedora I will be
>>> glade
>>> to see you on bugzilla.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gtkradiant mailing list
>>> Gtkradiant at icculus.org
>>> http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkradiant
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gtkradiant mailing list
>> Gtkradiant at icculus.org
>> http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkradiant
>
> But, using the same libraries, shouldn't it be the same thing?
>
> E.g. the libjpeg.so.62 library, isn't the same of the one inside this
> package?
> dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/18/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/l/libjpeg-turbo-1.2.1-3.fc18.i686.rpm
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gtkradiant mailing list
> Gtkradiant at icculus.org
> http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkradiant