[Gtkradiant] [Bug 1109] Wrong calculation
ofBEZIERCURVETREE_MAX_INDEX
Joseph, William
WJoseph at europe.ea.com
Tue Sep 12 08:22:41 CDT 2006
The calculation uses size_t because BEZIERCURVETREE_MAX_INDEX is
supposed to be the largest integer representable with a native type on
whatever architecture you're compiling for - if it was supposed to be
the same on all architectures then it would just be:
const std::size_t BEZIERCURVETREE_MAX_INDEX = 2147483648;
Though it never really needs to be that big anyway =).
-SPoG
-----Original Message-----
From: gtkradiant-bounces at zerowing.idsoftware.com
[mailto:gtkradiant-bounces at zerowing.idsoftware.com] On Behalf Of
bugzilla-daemon at zerowing.idsoftware.com
Sent: 12 September 2006 14:13
To: gtkradiant at zerowing.idsoftware.com
Subject: [Gtkradiant] [Bug 1109] Wrong calculation
ofBEZIERCURVETREE_MAX_INDEX
http://zerowing.idsoftware.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1109
spam at codecreator.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From spam at codecreator.net 2006-09-12 08:13
-------
Yes 2147483648 is correct.
The bitshift code is not from me, please don't ask me why it uses size_t
;)
Added the fix to trunk.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://zerowing.idsoftware.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
_______________________________________________
Gtkradiant mailing list
Gtkradiant at zerowing.idsoftware.com
http://zerowing.idsoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gtkradiant
More information about the Gtkradiant
mailing list