[cod] forget about IW2 and get back to work :)
sttr at nextgentel.com
Wed Oct 21 03:27:27 EDT 2009
Not at all, the issue isnt about cracked software or cheating at all.
And the discussion is moving towards the issue about gamepublishers
forcing unwanted gameplay changes by combining
security/performance-patches with new versions of the game.
Maybe you should have the right to play the game you bought, and not
have to install a patch that changes the way that game works
significantly. However, you should be able to install security fixes for
YES, I know that this is a bit out of the box and not a common business
sense for publishers... I do also understand the big problem with
pirated versions and cheating, but it's sometimes healthy to look at it
from different perspectives.
Fra: escapedturkey [mailto:escapedturkey at escapedturkey.com]
Sendt: 20. oktober 2009 19:18
Til: Call of Duty server admin list.
Emne: Re: [cod] forget about IW2 and get back to work :)
No, in that case we'd be telling him to install COD 4. If we carry this
analgoy further, what it seems he's asking is for a way to get Windows
security updates while bypassing the Windows Genuine authentication
Steffen Tronstad wrote:
> You _/can/_ install a serverpatch that doesnt affect the client. There
> are numerous patches for valve-games trough steam, that only affects
> dedicated server part (security/bugfixes).
> There is a difference between game-versions and general patches.
> What pet is asking for, is similar to asking for a security-fix
> (servicepack) for windows xp, and you are telling him to upgrade to
> windows vista :)
> *Fra:* dawa [mailto:bahaza at gmail.com]
> *Sendt:* 20. oktober 2009 16:47
> *Til:* Call of Duty server admin list.
> *Emne:* Re: [cod] forget about IW2 and get back to work :)
> You can give the reason that you prefer to use 1.0 servers, it doesn't
> matter to the purposes of this list. The point is that if you want
> support, you must be using the latest version of the game...as simple
> that. I'd really like to know how did you pretend to fix the bug
> installing a patch?...funny thing.
> It's also more than a game for me, and that's why I use the latest
> version, as any serious gamer would do.
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:18 PM, pet <games at maxrate.pl
> <mailto:games at maxrate.pl>> wrote:
> Sorry, wrong thinking. lam not going to remove cod2 1.0 server from
> offer, it would be a suicide like for other game hosting companies in
> my country. Nearly 80% call of duty customers rents cod2 1.0 version.
> Above mentioned problems doesn't appear each day, but one time per
> month. Our cod2 1.0 community is very large. They do not play 1.0
> because of pirated clients, they do this because the 1.3 patch brings
> many unexpected add-ons/patches which makes the game-play very poor.
> same issue was by counter strike 1.4, the aiming was beautiful and
> was nearly perfect, there was no need to make some improvements, but
> unfortunately the new 1.6 patch made this game unplayable. If somebody
> is cheating on cod2 1.0 he can also cheat in further versions as well,
> cheaters are everywhere, it's up to You how to handle with them.
> Naturally cod2 1.3 is very good for clan battles etc., You have more
> tools to fight with the cheaters and pirated clients and this is a
> site of this version and punk buster implementation as well. There
> always good and bad sites. But as I mentioned before, I will not
> from cod2 1.0 or counter strike 1.4 as long as theirs communities
> growing up and there will bo more fans than any other FPS game on our
> market. Do not forget, we have a here some phenomenon, how old this
> game is - we know it, how much servers are still on-line - we know
> There will be a lots of games which dies with natural death, but cod2
> 1.0 will be still alive :). For me it means more than game...
> cod mailing list
> cod at icculus.org
cod mailing list
cod at icculus.org
More information about the cod