[cod] 1.3 patch

[Robert Jonker]

Well, actually, the security of a system is for 99% dependent of its
administrator's knowledge/policy. Running both linux and windows servers, I
hardly see any difference in security and uptime between these two OS's.

 

Also, there are control panels that don't care whether the remote machine is
linux or windows, when it comes to starting/stopping/restarting remote
processes.

 

The only difference for me is that a win2k3 license costs me some money, and
if you'd ask me, that's the main reason why there are more linux cod2
servers than windows.

 

Robert 

 

  _____  

Van: Mr Hobgoblin [mailto:mr.hobgoblin at gmail.com] 
Verzonden: woensdag 21 juni 2006 13:56
Aan: cod at icculus.org
Onderwerp: Re: [cod] 1.3 patch

 

Nicely put,

;@)

 

On 21/06/06, john at sherrit.net <john at sherrit.net> wrote: 

Doesn't surprise me that windows shows more servers.

My server host offered me the chance to move to windows server because 
of this problem but I prefer linux as it can run and run and run
without a restart not to mention the nice control panel that linux
servers have for remote starting and stopping.

you can't beat linux for security either. 



 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/cod/attachments/20060621/14c90e5d/attachment.htm>