[cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
colin at bell-pc.com
colin at bell-pc.com
Thu Apr 13 16:24:26 EDT 2006
But at the end of the day if Linux cant emulate DirectX and run the same
games better, then the antichrist has won ? or am i full of shit and no
nothen ?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Wheeler" <randywheeler at gmail.com>
To: <cod at icculus.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
> Blame the devlopers Linux is always secondary in thought
> Too bad John Carmack is slowly retiring he was the only one
> to stand up against Mircoslut and tell them you put OpenGl in
> windows or ID's game will not run on windows..
>
> everyone else just kisses Micronutts arse
>
>
> On 4/13/06, colin at bell-pc.com <colin at bell-pc.com> wrote:
>> la de da ..pff whats the problem ..where is it? has the anti christ mr
>> gates
>> won ? is Linux dead?
>>
>> :p
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Michelle E" <michelle_s4f at hotmail.co.uk>
>> To: <cod at icculus.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 3:57 PM
>> Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>>
>>
>> > I'll come along with you....hehehe
>> >
>> >
>> >>From: <colin at bell-pc.com>
>> >>Reply-To: cod at icculus.org
>> >>To: <cod at icculus.org>
>> >>Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:55:36 +0100
>> >>
>> >>Ah so PB obviously have the new cod2_lnxded bin, Think ill go make
>> >>friends
>> >>with them he he
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>----- Original Message ----- From: "Lumo" <lumo at gmen-clan.de>
>> >>To: <cod at icculus.org>
>> >>Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 3:12 PM
>> >>Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>Well, the PB-files are already finished.
>> >>>Server + Client
>> >>>
>> >>>Take a look here:
>> >>>http://www.evenbalance.com/index.php?page=dl-cod2.php
>> >>>
>> >>>So i think we are waiting for the Gamefile cod2_lnxded now ...
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>colin at bell-pc.com schrieb:
>> >>>>I would have thought the security of PB anticheat was the makers of
>> >>>>PB's
>> >>>>problem not Ryan's , Activisions , IW's problem
>> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
>> >>>>
>> >>>> *From:* Dave Whitney <mailto:whitney321 at yahoo.com>
>> >>>> *To:* cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>> >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, April 13, 2006 2:19 PM
>> >>>> *Subject:* RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>>>
>> >>>> This is a really good point. The more I think of this, the more
>> >>>> it makes sense.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> */Cod Admin <cod at se-easy.net <mailto:cod at se-easy.net>>/* wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> And for the problem of leaking the beta, we don't have to
>> >>>> forget punkbuster is part of the code so i think from the
>> >>>> view
>> >>>> of security this is the delay. We don't want hackers etc.
>> >>>> etc.
>> >>>> break the anticheat, then we have again a game like
>> >>>> mohaa...No
>> >>>> anticheat full of cheaters..:-(
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Cheers
>> >>>> Quint
>> >>>>
>> >>>> *From:* LeadBritches
>> >>>> [mailto:leadbritches at austinservers.com]
>> >>>> *To:* cod at icculus.org
>> >>>> *Sent:* Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:45:35 +0200
>> >>>> *Subject:* RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>>>
>> >>>> From my experience here... Ryan has represented
>> >>>> IW/Activision better than
>> >>>> they have represented themselves. If they handled their
>> >>>> business they way
>> >>>> Ryan handles his then we would have had this patch (not
>> >>>> to
>> >>>> mention a better
>> >>>> game) months ago.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Everything Ryan has done to date has been more than fine
>> >>>> by me.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -----Original Message-----
>> >>>> From: colin at bell-pc.com <mailto:colin at bell-pc.com>
>> >>>> [mailto:colin at bell-pc.com <mailto:colin at bell-pc.com>]
>> >>>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 7:36 AM
>> >>>> To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>> >>>> Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ah I see ha ha !
>> >>>> Well they need to give him some overtime and a
>> >>>> completion
>> >>>> bonus incentive me
>> >>>>
>> >>>> thinks :p
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
>> >>>> From: "James Landi" <jim at landi.net
>> >>>> <mailto:jim at landi.net>>
>> >>>> To: <cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>>
>> >>>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 1:20 PM
>> >>>> Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> > Activision is paying him so I would guess he gives a
>> >>>> damn LOL
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Activision/IW contracts Ryan to do the Linux work for
>> >>>> them, he is a paid
>> >>>> > sub
>> >>>> > contractor, thus their approval.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > -Jim
>> >>>> > Rudedog
>> >>>> > FPSadmin.com
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > -----Original Message-----
>> >>>> > From: colin at bell-pc.com <mailto:colin at bell-pc.com>
>> >>>> [mailto:colin at bell-pc.com <mailto:colin at bell-pc.com>]
>> >>>> > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 8:01 AM
>> >>>> > To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>> >>>> > Subject: Re: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > So why put in the readme that Activision doesnt
>> >>>> support
>> >>>> the Linux server
>> >>>> > version and then delay the release untill Activision
>> >>>> approve it???? . May
>> >>>> > aswell just release it, if thats the case
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Does Ryan really give a dam if activision approve it
>> >>>> or
>> >>>> not??
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> >>>> > From: "Michelle E" <michelle_s4f at hotmail.co.uk
>> >>>> <mailto:michelle_s4f at hotmail.co.uk>>
>> >>>> > To: <cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>>
>> >>>> > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 12:50 PM
>> >>>> > Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >>I got a mail from Ryan to say 'Any day now...they're
>> >>>> done, we're just
>> >>>> >>waiting for Activision to approve them'
>> >>>> >> so seems like a hold up from Activision again...or am
>> >>>> i
>> >>>> missing
>> >>>> >> somethiing?
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>>From: "James Landi" <jim at landi.net
>> >>>> <mailto:jim at landi.net>>
>> >>>> >>>Reply-To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>> >>>> >>>To: <cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>>
>> >>>> >>>Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>>> >>>Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 07:40:04 -0400
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>>I would assume that Ryan really can't do much until
>> >>>> he
>> >>>> has the final
>> >>>> >>>code,
>> >>>> >>>Then that's when all his fun starts ;)
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>>-Jim
>> >>>> >>>Rudedog
>> >>>> >>>FPSadmin.com
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>>-----Original Message-----
>> >>>> >>>From: Michelle E [mailto:michelle_s4f at hotmail.co.uk
>> >>>> <mailto:michelle_s4f at hotmail.co.uk>]
>> >>>> >>>Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 7:37 AM
>> >>>> >>>To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>> >>>> >>>Subject: RE: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>>So does anyone know why it takes so long to release?
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> >From: Dave Whitney <whitney321 at yahoo.com
>> >>>> <mailto:whitney321 at yahoo.com>>
>> >>>> >>> >Reply-To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>> >>>> >>> >To: cod at icculus.org <mailto:cod at icculus.org>
>> >>>> >>> >Subject: [cod] Re: how long 1st cod2 binary took
>> >>>> >>> >Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 04:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >Last fall, I think is was almost 2 weeks before the
>> >>>> beta got leaked,
>> >>>> >>> >and
>> >>>> >>> >then a month for the final release.
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >Frenton <frenton at orcon.net.nz
>> >>>> <mailto:frenton at orcon.net.nz>> wrote: Not so sure about
>> >>>> that, but it
>> >>>> >>> >took
>> >>>> >>> >several weeks that time -
>> >>>> >>> >hopefully it doesn't take so long this time...
>> >>>> >>> >Am 13.04.2006 um 12:36 schrieb ::DFC::MacBooom[NL]:
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> > > Ola all,
>> >>>> >>> > >
>> >>>> >>> > > Does anyone remember how long it took during
>> >>>> vcod
>> >>>> and uo or even
>> >>>> >>> > > with the
>> >>>> >>> > > release of cod2 to get Ryan's Linux binaries
>> >>>> approved?
>> >>>> >>> > >
>> >>>> >>> > > That might give a good indication for how long
>> >>>> we
>> >>>> all will have to
>> >>>> >>> > > wait.
>> >>>> >>> > >
>> >>>> >>> > > And looking at the IWN forums, they all are
>> >>>> getting crazy now
>> >>>> >>> > > waiting again
>> >>>> >>> > > for ACTV to approve for the last part of the
>> >>>> patch
>> >>>> to get all their
>> >>>> >>> > > servers
>> >>>> >>> > > running;-)
>> >>>> >>> > > It is almost hilarious on that forum and every
>> >>>> body flaming
>> >>>> >>> > > constantly to
>> >>>> >>> > > IW/AV.
>> >>>> >>> > >
>> >>>> >>> > > Ryan keep up the good work, us the cod gamers
>> >>>> are
>> >>>> happy that at
>> >>>> >>> > > least you
>> >>>> >>> > > give us the support which we should actually get
>> >>>> from IW/AV for al
>> >>>> >>> > > those
>> >>>> >>> > > linux boxes that run cod2.
>> >>>> >>> > >
>> >>>> >>> > > MacBooom
>> >>>> >>> > >
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >
>> >>>> >>> >---------------------------------
>> >>>> >>> >Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make
>> >>>> PC-to-Phone calls. Great
>> >>>> >>>rates
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> >starting at 1¢/min.
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> >>>_________________________________________________________________
>> >>>> >>>The new MSN Search Toolbar now includes Desktop
>> >>>> search!
>> >>>> >>>http://join.msn.com/toolbar/overview
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>_________________________________________________________________
>> >>>> >> Are you using the latest version of MSN Messenger?
>> >>>> Download MSN Messenger
>> >>>> >> 7.5 today! http://join.msn.com/messenger/overview
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> --
>> >>>> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> >>>> >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> >>>> >> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 -
>> >>>> Release Date: 12/04/2006
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > --
>> >>>> > No virus found in this incoming message.
>> >>>> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> >>>> > Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 -
>> >>>> Release
>> >>>> Date: 12/04/2006
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Blab-away for as little as 1�/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls
>> >>>>
>> >>>><http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman2/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=39663/*http://voice.yahoo.com>
>> >>>> using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> >>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> >>>> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 - Release Date:
>> >>>> 12/04/2006
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>--
>> >>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>> >>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> >>>Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 - Release Date:
>> >>>12/04/2006
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> > _________________________________________________________________
>> > Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free
>> > newsletters!
>> > http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > No virus found in this incoming message.
>> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> > Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 - Release Date:
>> > 12/04/2006
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 - Release Date: 12/04/2006
More information about the Cod
mailing list