[cod] Anyone running a good COD or UO with 1.5x???

[Jay Vasallo]

>>Now question is Jay, are you talking Fedura Core 1 or Core 2???

Fedora Cora 2 64. I also made a nice little script I can give you that does all the rpm updating automatically. It also installs a gcc compiler. After that it compiles lastest Openssl and 32 bit libs. All done in 15 minutes. Let me know when you need the disk, I can mail you a set.

 

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Mark J. DeFilippis 
  To: cod at icculus.org 
  Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 9:54 PM
  Subject: Re: [cod] Anyone running a good COD or UO with 1.5x???



  I believe he mentioned this Steve.  Not load balancing, but scheduling as you point out.
  The scheduler does not nail the process to a particular CPU, as is the case
  with other versions of Linux.  Support certainly must be there on the processor
  however for SMP.

  Lets not forget about things such as tag-cache on chip, pre-fetch,
  and the like. Little good if your tag cache is on processor 0, and the process is
  scheduled back on cpu 1. But then again, I believe this is built in to the
  Hypertransports, based on some architecture readings
  a while back. (memory is 43 y/o now... but I think is correct).

  Recently my ES 3.0 kernel was updated with the preliminary support for
  the upcoming 2.6 kernel which offers this support. I am preying this
  helps.

  (BTW, best I could find stock is 248's in a dual AMD package
  at $299/mo w/ 2GB ram hosted.  The co-lo option is not reasonable
  for me.  If I procure the Tyan board, and Processor/memory,
  the bandwidth is cost prohibitive. I end up paying more for
  the Bandwidth than I do now for the Dual P4 with the bandwidth.
  (Looking at the planet, EV1, ServerBeach, Verio, and the sub-slime ;-)
  But I am so curious anyway, I just ordered a 2x248 and tyan MB from
  newegg.com for my server rack.  (It is nice to be santa to yourself
  first. ;-) )   Ironically ServerMatrix does not seem to offer Fedura
  in their offerings. It may be tough to get them to support it operationally...

  Now question is Jay, are you talking Fedura Core 1 or Core 2???

  Thanks for the help. And Thanks for the info Steve. I also did not find any 448's,
  nor 848's, but I could be looking at the wrong places for the 848's...

  Happy Holidays. And thanks for the help guys.

  Mark


  At 02:25 PM 12/24/2004, you wrote:

    In essence the Opteron scales better due to fact it has dedicated
    CPU <=> CPU interconnects where as the P4 doesn't. Nothing more
    nothing less there ( to my knowledge ). There is no automatic CPU
    load balancing on the CPU or MB its all down to the OS. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/cod/attachments/20041225/acd0788a/attachment.htm>