[cod] Anyone running a good COD or UO with 1.5x???

[Armageddon]

I hit 23 % for 10 players on a dual opteron :O   thats 1/4 of a dual opteron
for 10 player server ? uhoh :(

-----Original Message-----
From: Pablo DD [mailto:paddxxxx at arnet.com.ar] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 11:35 AM
To: cod at icculus.org
Subject: Re: [cod] Anyone running a good COD or UO with 1.5x???

emmmmm

5 players 20% of cpu, dont looking good, ill see how much it use with 20/20




----- Original Message -----
From: "John Kennington" <john.kennington at buzzcard.gatech.edu>
To: <cod at icculus.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 1:29 PM
Subject: RE: [cod] Anyone running a good COD or UO with 1.5x???


> Ours works fine with AWE 2.0 BETA.  I have 3 servers running and no
crashes
> (knock on wood!).
>
> John Kennington
> Assistant Director - Operations
> BuzzCard Center
> Georgia Institute of Technology
> 350 Ferst Dr. NW
> Houston Bookstore Mall
> Atlanta, GA  30332
> 404-385-2961
> 678-283-3385 Cell
> 404-894-2049 FAX
> http://www.buzzcard.gatech.edu/
> BuzzCard FAQs:  http://www.buzzcard.gatech.edu/faqs/index.htm
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rbishop at vollmer.com [mailto:rbishop at vollmer.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 11:26 AM
> To: cod at icculus.org
> Subject: RE: [cod] Anyone running a good COD or UO with 1.5x???
>
> works fine with no mods.  I think the mods are what are causing the lags.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ploppy [mailto:ploppy at xde.nl]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 11:21 AM
> To: cod at icculus.org
> Subject: [cod] Anyone running a good COD or UO with 1.5x???
>
>
>
> Does anyone has COD and UO upgraded to 1.5x (linux offcourse :-)) and has
it
> running without lags, crashes etc????? Should we upgrade yet or wait
because
> the list is running with complaints?
>
>
>
> Ploppy
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission is confidential
> and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed.
> If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return
it to
> the sender.
>