[cod] Hunk Megs

[Jay Vasallo]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andre Lorbach" <alorbach at ro1.adiscon.com>
To: <cod at icculus.org>
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 10:56 AM
Subject: RE: [cod] Hunk Megs


I gonna try that, too - if it works it is the best ever send on this
mailinglist :D

--
deltaray

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jay Vasallo [mailto:jayco1 at charter.net] 
> Sent: Montag, 13. Dezember 2004 17:42
> To: cod at icculus.org
> Subject: Re: [cod] Hunk Megs
> 
> Thanks Ken, You have been a great help!
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken " <ken at moonridge.net>
> To: <cod at icculus.org>
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 10:15 AM
> Subject: RE: [cod] Hunk Megs
> 
> 
> >> Doesn't really help too much tbh. Just make sure you have more than
> >> what the server needs, it won't use all of 256M anyway. 
> I'd probably
> >> suggest something like 128M.
> > 
> > 128 is stock... So changing the setting to 128 does nothing!
> > 
> > We left ours at 128 and once the server hit about 26 users, 
> it ran like
> > crap. We upped it to 256 and we are running 34 users no problem!
> > 
> > IW has even stated they would recommends running it higher 
> than the stock
> > 128!
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jay Vasallo [mailto:jayco1 at charter.net] 
> > Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 7:17 AM
> > To: cod at icculus.org
> > Subject: Re: [cod] Hunk Megs
> > 
> > thank you.
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Ian mu" <mu.llamas at gmail.com>
> > To: <cod at icculus.org>
> > Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 6:27 AM
> > Subject: Re: [cod] Hunk Megs
> > 
> > 
> >> Doesn't really help too much tbh. Just make sure you have more than
> >> what the server needs, it won't use all of 256M anyway. 
> I'd probably
> >> suggest something like 128M.
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
> 
>