[cod] Hunk Megs

[Ian mu]

Weird, mines never gone anywhere near that amount, and never above 128
(for hunk usage), apologies, in that case check on your own setup and
try and figure out usage, 256 may well be a safer bet but seems
excessive for a server imo. Not sure if some are using the client hunk
amounts but assuming talking server. Best bet in that case is to do
some monitoring of your server, and apologies if misleading. Think I'm
gonna wander off and try and figure why my servers using a lot less
hunk memory.


On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 08:15:12 -0800, Ken <ken at moonridge.net> wrote:
> > Doesn't really help too much tbh. Just make sure you have more than
> > what the server needs, it won't use all of 256M anyway. I'd probably
> > suggest something like 128M.
> 
> 128 is stock... So changing the setting to 128 does nothing!
> 
> We left ours at 128 and once the server hit about 26 users, it ran like
> crap. We upped it to 256 and we are running 34 users no problem!
> 
> IW has even stated they would recommends running it higher than the stock
> 128!
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jay Vasallo [mailto:jayco1 at charter.net]
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 7:17 AM
> To: cod at icculus.org
> Subject: Re: [cod] Hunk Megs
> 
> thank you.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ian mu" <mu.llamas at gmail.com>
> To: <cod at icculus.org>
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 6:27 AM
> Subject: Re: [cod] Hunk Megs
> 
> > Doesn't really help too much tbh. Just make sure you have more than
> > what the server needs, it won't use all of 256M anyway. I'd probably
> > suggest something like 128M.
> >
> 
>