[bf1942] Punkbuster (Was: How could DICE agree to this??)

[Scummy]

3.2 P4, 1gb ram.
We are also the only server on our box.

Something has changed and our resources or network is not the issue.

This lag has just occurred over the last few months.

Suspects are BBO or PB.

Used to have no issues before.



-----Original Message-----
From: Joe [mailto:sechon at blackmud.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 6:23 PM
To: bf1942 at icculus.org
Subject: RE: [bf1942] Punkbuster (Was: How could DICE agree to this??)


Ok..Dual 2.8 Xeon, 2gb ram. 100mbit link. We were the only process on this
machine, with and without HT enabled via bios. Win2k3. Open to
suggestions....

-----Original Message-----
From: Lance Woollett [mailto:baalzaman at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 7:18 PM
To: bf1942 at icculus.org
Subject: Re: [bf1942] Punkbuster (Was: How could DICE agree to this??)


We are currently running some 22 BF (1942 and vietnam) servers, all
with the BBO tools, and from what we have seen the BBO overhead is
negligible. The ease of use the tools gives more than makes up for any
overhead IMO. Got lag issues? Look at your server specs first.