[bf1942] Status of Linux server? Ryan? Hello?

[prodigy]

Actually, this is ryan's job, regardless of how easy or hard it is.  He is
being paid to do this... so its not unusual for people to expect things from
him.  It is however "BETA" software, so how much can one really expect?

James

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Stone" <stone99 at attbi.com>
To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 2:06 AM
Subject: Re: [bf1942] Status of Linux server? Ryan? Hello?


> "It has been 8 days since we heard from Ryan, when the current release of
> his software is not usable."
>
> Dude it's BETA! 8 days? We're lucky it hasn't been 8 months! Give Ryan a
> break and let him work on it. We are all helping him by pointing out
> problems we have found. It's not any help just saying "the current release
> of his software is not usable". Do you think his job is easy? Maybe you
> could do better?
>
> Keep up the good work Ryan, don't let these types get to ya.
>
> -Stone
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stewart, John" <johns at artesyncp.com>
> To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 2:01 PM
> Subject: RE: [bf1942] Status of Linux server? Ryan? Hello?
>
>
> >
> > > I do indeed keep up to date. But you quoted a post re his
> > > waiting for a patch on
> > > a non-issue in a thread with an ungratefull, impatient title...
> >
> > *I* started this thread with this post. I never said anything about the
> client-side bug:
> >
> > > Well, 1.3 Linux has been out for a while now. It's obvious it
> > > has some *serious* problems, making it unusable for the most of us.
> > >
> > > Many of us have been patiently waiting for a status update,
> > > or at least a response to these issues, in the last week.
> > >
> > > Could you *please* let us know where you are at, Ryan? Are
> > > you making any progress at nailing any of these bugs? Do you
> > > need more information from anyone to help out?
> >
> > It was not clear, I agree, what bugs I was specifically referring to.
But
> I think all of us understand the transparency bug is an issue that only
can
> be solved by a new client patch. I know this is about the Linux server.
The
> Linux server, as released, has serious bugs which we have been discussing
> since last Monday.
> >
> > The last email from Ryan was on 2/10. I put his name in the subject line
> in the hopes that he would see this and respond with an update, given the
> relatively high traffic the list has had in the last week.
> >
> > I do not think I was rude in asking for a status update. It has been 8
> days since we heard from Ryan, when the current release of his software is
> not usable.
> >
> > johnS
>
>