Why? When I think about how much effort has been wasted by forking Wine to WineX, it's kind of frustrating. Even worse, they took advantage of the X11 license, so they don't contribute anything back to the community as a whole and get away with it.
Screw the whole lot of 'em.<br><br>Waiting patiently to buy a copy.<br>-Wyatt<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 3, 2007 4:44 AM, Jimmy Forrester-Fellowes <<a href="mailto:jimmyxx@gmail.com" target="_blank">jimmyxx@gmail.com
</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>On Dec 2, 2007 11:53 PM, Dean Hamstead <<a href="mailto:dean@fragfest.com.au" target="_blank">dean@fragfest.com.au</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
cedega has now fallen miserably behind wine. cedega 6 broke more games than<br>it fixed, and shortly there after the few games cedega did run better than<br>wine, were caught up and overtaken by wine. i then ended my subscription.
<br></blockquote></div><div><br>It seems TransGaming are pouring all their effort into Cider while Cedega sits on the shelf gathering dust and quickly becoming obsolete. Its a shame because I loved what they were trying to do
<br>
<br>-- Jimmy<br></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br>