[ut3] hey

Ryan Barton debian.moment at gmail.com
Sat Sep 4 15:26:47 EDT 2010


Could be middleware like steam, strange to think that steam for mac was
released a month ago then ut3 for mac appears in the headlines

On Sep 4, 2010 1:08 PM, "Daniel Eckl" <daniel.eckl at gmx.de> wrote:

I'm still puzzled about why somebody would think .NET could be
involved. If you want to run .NET code on Linux, you have to go for
mono anyway. Well of course, one might think that Microsoft then could
argue that mono is infringing some of their patents, and that's why
the port is not possible, but that's rather doubtable, because in this
case MS could have killed mono for good long time ago. Okay, dunno
what deals Miguel de Icaza or Novell might have with Microsoft, but I
can't imagine that there are hidden unbelievable secrets.

Patents more often are in techniques like physics engine (havok,
physix, etc) or voice middleware (vivox, voiceage) or such. If the
patent owner refuses to do the port and refuses to give
permission/docs to you to port it yourself, then you're busted, no
matter how good you can develop.

2010/9/4 Валерий <jazzvoid at gmail.com>:

> I don't really understand what features of .NET could be removed from
server > and hardcoded in cl...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/ut3/attachments/20100904/7e34c61f/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the ut3 mailing list